No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Proofpoint Email Protection vs SecurityCoach comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Proofpoint Email Protection
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (1st), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (3rd), Digital Risk Protection (3rd), Office 365 Protection (1st), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (2nd)
SecurityCoach
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
2.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Security Awareness Training (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Proofpoint Email Protection and SecurityCoach aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Proofpoint Email Protection is designed for Secure Email Gateway (SEG) and holds a mindshare of 21.1%, down 21.8% compared to last year.
SecurityCoach, on the other hand, focuses on Security Awareness Training, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Proofpoint Email Protection21.1%
Microsoft Defender for Office 36519.9%
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection17.1%
Other41.9%
Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
Security Awareness Training Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SecurityCoach0.6%
KnowBe416.3%
Riot7.4%
Other75.69999999999999%
Security Awareness Training
 

Featured Reviews

AshishKochhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Team Lead at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Advanced email protection has blocked targeted attacks and reduces manual threat handling
I feel Proofpoint Email Protection is overpriced. I cannot say that the security level being provided does not justify the cost, but when comparing the similar level of security with other applications or security systems, it is overpriced. If Proofpoint could provide offers or discounts for customers who are already using the product or for new customers implementing it, along with some free services or add-ons, that would be helpful in terms of financial expense. Proofpoint Email Protection has recently introduced AI functionality in terms of data security capabilities and protecting AI assistance from targeted attacks. This is important since everything is now related to AI. The solution is doing threat detection and real-time threat detection and response pretty well. There are a few things I would like to see improved. Sometimes Proofpoint Email Protection takes time to analyze the workflow and the nature of the email. In this age of AI, the solution should analyze an email on the first receipt and determine whether it should pass or be marked as spam without checking previous data. Another improvement would be to have a more user-friendly dashboard. Additionally, if Proofpoint could add the same features in BCP as part of email protection in BCP, it would be helpful since I currently have to take a different add-on for BCP, and integrating it would save costs. I cannot say that threats have increased or decreased with Proofpoint Email Protection because it depends on the mail flow. The solution captures and filters out all threats, and the email threats vary every day depending on how many users are receiving how many emails per day. Today there might be 1,000 emails, tomorrow 5,000, and the day after 500. Proofpoint Email Protection does its job by scanning all emails and threats are reduced to some extent. Since I am aware that virus definitions are updated every day, I cannot blame Proofpoint Email Protection if they take time to determine the nature of an email being received. There are sometimes emails that are false positives, and Proofpoint Email Protection is a bit strict in analyzing false positives, sometimes stopping emails that are actually required. It analyzes the previous nature of an email and if a template looks like an informational template or related to spam, it blocks it because it looks similar to one blocked earlier. However, the template might actually be required. If I receive the same template today that is also blocked by Proofpoint Email Protection, that particular template might be useful and should not be blocked. In such cases, I have to raise it as a false positive stating that this is something in use or my users use and should be released. When AI starts doing its work, it analyzes the email from a sender with a particular template and releases it, but if the same email and template come from another sender, it blocks it according to the policies.
Rivka Alexander - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Specialist at PeerSpot
Improved Security Awareness Enhances Organizational Learning and Reduces Phishing Incidents
Regarding analytics and dashboard functionality, it was somewhat beneficial. It provides insight into campaign metrics, showing numbers of people who were phished, clicked on links, or avoided phishing attempts. However, it doesn't provide a complete picture of insights. When running campaigns, I had to download the data from SecurityCoach and present it manually in dashboards through Power BI or Excel sheets. The data analysis and reporting aspects could be improved to provide better insights. We encountered an issue during a phishing campaign where there was downtime from SecurityCoach's end, which delayed our scheduled campaign. After contacting technical support, we learned about their status page where we could check scheduled downtimes, bug fixes, and patches. They helped us proceed with our phishing campaign once the solution was operational. The modules tested were good, though they could add advanced features. The main area for improvement remains the dashboarding capabilities. Apart from that, there aren't significant areas requiring improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to use, even for those new to IT."
"The most valuable feature is the option to edit the inbound security."
"It was easy to set up."
"The stability is good; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it's reliable."
"It's the top choice because no company can operate without security. Ensuring email protection is a major priority for any organization when building its infrastructure."
"The solution has very strong detection for most of the phishing and malicious emails received from the outside."
"Proofpoint Email Protection has positively impacted my organization by ensuring we are not at risk of a breach through email."
"The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are the performance from being on the cloud."
"SecurityCoach is designed to teach from scratch, making learning an easy and fun experience for everyone, and it helped us reduce our phishing numbers and incidents as people became more aware of security incidents and their security responsibilities."
 

Cons

"I think Proofpoint Email Protection could be slightly more intuitive."
"Proofpoint Email Protection provides a solution for user training, which I did not end up going with because I chose KnowBe4. That is the only part I did not appreciate about it."
"The false positives are an issue."
"The solution could be improved with the addition of PLP and email encryption features."
"I believe they still need to improve by consolidating some portals, as currently, you have to log in separately to a few of them."
"I would like to see improvements in Proofpoint Email Protection's portal as it is sometimes slow."
"Pricing for the platform could still be cheaper."
"I would like to see improvements in the transition from Proofpoint Protection Server to Proofpoint on Demand because Proofpoint Protection Server is not very user-friendly and requires logging into two portals for some features."
"When running campaigns, I had to download the data from SecurityCoach and present it manually in dashboards through Power BI or Excel sheets."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is on a yearly basis. Their floor for SMB doesn't matter. The user count is 100 users and below at $2,500 a year. Its cost is higher than other solutions. It is probably about 20% to 30% higher than what you would get with Microsoft. There are no additional costs. All costs are factored in. It can be improved pricing-wise so that it is affordable for the SMB market."
"We sell annual licenses for this solution."
"The price is reasonable."
"The licensing is basically $8/user."
"Clients pay for an annual subscription of Proofpoint Email Protection. Every client always finds it expensive."
"The licensing cost of Proofpoint Email Protection is a lot higher than other solutions, such as Barracuda."
"Customers pay around $90,000 yearly for a 1,000-user organization, with the subscription license being the main expense, apart from implementation fees."
"Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise43
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Email Protection?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Proofpoint Email Protection, but I think it's a bit pricey compared to other solutions, even though we found no competitor with comparable...
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Email Protection?
Some of the old portal features of Proofpoint Email Protection are missing in the new portal, so some of the settings could be modernized. The TRAP mail gateway product of Proofpoint Email Protecti...
What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Email Protection?
Proofpoint Email Protection is primarily used for anti-spam purposes. As other companies receive a lot of malware, phishing emails, and unwanted bulk email, Proofpoint Email Protection stops unwant...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityCoach?
In both organizations, which had around 1,000 employees each, we had licenses for approximately 1,000 employees. One organization acquired them from their parent company and the other acquired from...
What needs improvement with SecurityCoach?
Regarding analytics and dashboard functionality, it was somewhat beneficial. It provides insight into campaign metrics, showing numbers of people who were phished, clicked on links, or avoided phis...
What is your primary use case for SecurityCoach?
I was mainly doing the awareness training and awareness module of SecurityCoach. I have used it twice in two companies for a longer period of time. I was the lead to get the tool deployed in the or...
 

Also Known As

Proofpoint Enterprise Protection, Proofpoint Digital Protection
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blocket, University of Waterloo, Lincoln Memorial University, WellSpan Health, U-Haul, Carestream Health, Westinghouse
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Proofpoint, Mimecast and others in Secure Email Gateway (SEG). Updated: February 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.