Planisware vs Zoho Sprints comparison

"I found Planisware really effective, and I appreciate it."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"Planisware is a beautiful tool that is very efficient, clear, well-designed, and more robust than any I have used."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Planisware is due to its efficacy and speed; it has very few updates and is easy to use."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"Zoho Sprints is a defect-logging tool."

"Zoho Sprints can be integrated with other Zoho products, providing additional functionality."

"Zoho Sprints is stable with minimal downtime."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"Zoho Sprints is a confusing tool, and you need to get used to it."

"The interface of Zoho Sprints is an area with certain shortcomings."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"Zoho Sprints is a more cost-effective solution than Jira."

"The price of Zoho Sprints is between 10 to 25 USD per user per month."