Planisware vs Zoho Sprints comparison

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Planisware has improved our project visibility, resource utilization, decision-making, and cost control, leading to higher efficiency and better alignment between business strategy and project execution."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"I found Planisware really effective, and I appreciate it."

"Planisware is a beautiful tool that is very efficient, clear, well-designed, and more robust than any I have used."

"Zoho Sprints is stable with minimal downtime."

"Zoho Sprints can be integrated with other Zoho products, providing additional functionality."

"Zoho Sprints is a defect-logging tool."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The reports should be improved because all companies now need reporting, and with tools such as Grafana or Tableau, Planisware needs to add interfaces for data lakes since all companies require this."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"Zoho Sprints is a confusing tool, and you need to get used to it."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"The interface of Zoho Sprints is an area with certain shortcomings."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"It comes with a high cost."

"There are training and certification costs."

"Zoho Sprints is a more cost-effective solution than Jira."

"The price of Zoho Sprints is between 10 to 25 USD per user per month."