Planisware vs Zoho Sprints comparison

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"Zoho Sprints is stable with minimal downtime."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Zoho Sprints is a defect-logging tool."

"Zoho Sprints can be integrated with other Zoho products, providing additional functionality."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"Zoho Sprints is a confusing tool, and you need to get used to it."

"The interface of Zoho Sprints is an area with certain shortcomings."

"There is a need to improve the charts and velocity calculations in Zoho Sprints."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The price of Zoho Sprints is between 10 to 25 USD per user per month."

"Zoho Sprints is a more cost-effective solution than Jira."