PingAccess vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PingAccess and Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Access Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Doctor Ngobeni
Use Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The solution is highly stable and scalable
Top Answer:The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning.
Top Answer:PingAccess is used for managing access, URL management, and website management.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
15th
out of 37 in Access Management
Views
273
Comparisons
200
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
201
Rating
10.0
25th
out of 37 in Access Management
Views
89
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate
Learn More
Overview

PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine. It provides secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL level, and ensures that only authorized users access the resources they need.

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), revolutionizes remote access security for enterprise applications. By replacing traditional VPNs with secure, temporary connections solely to required applications, it significantly reduces the attack surface, mitigating the risk of data breaches. Whether accessing cloud-based or on-premises applications, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) ensures robust security through continuous authentication and authorization, adhering to the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify." This solution not only enhances security by reducing unauthorized access but also simplifies access for users while offering scalability and cost savings by eliminating the need for complex hardware and software. Tailored for organizations with remote workforces, cloud-based applications, and stringent data security concerns, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) stands as an efficient and scalable access control solution among its competitors.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm54%
Transportation Company8%
Insurance Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise91%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Access Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review while Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is ranked 25th in Access Management. PingAccess is rated 10.0, while Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". On the other hand, PingAccess is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and ForgeRock, whereas Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is most compared with .

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.