Ping Identity Platform vs Vanta comparison

Ping Identity and Vanta are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ping Identity is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Vanta is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Ping Identity holds a 0.3% mindshare in DG, compared to Vanta’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vanta users who would recommend it.

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

5,579 Views
112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Vanta

Read 6 Vanta reviews

3,047 Views
396 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Vanta

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Vanta are competing products in digital identity and security. Ping Identity Platform stands out with its robust features, while Vanta offers competitive pricing and strong ROI, providing value despite higher initial costs.

Features: Ping Identity Platform provides solutions focusing on secure and seamless user authentication, multifactor authentication support from different sources, and robust identity management capabilities, including customization options. Vanta emphasizes continuous monitoring and compliance automation, prebuilt control frameworks, and efficient task management, enabling organizations to meet compliance with ease.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could improve user interface intuitiveness and expand compatibility with non-standard applications. It could also benefit from simplifying its configuration process for smoother onboarding. Vanta, while beneficial in automation, might enhance integration flexibility with diverse platforms, refine its real-time API integration, and improve the clarity of its policy compliance guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform is noted for its smooth deployment and customer support, facilitating swift integration into existing systems. Vanta offers reliable support and excels with a simple setup due to its cloud-native design, allowing for easy scalability across varied environments.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform generally requires a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive identity solutions, yet delivers long-term ROI. Vanta, although initially less costly, effectively balances cost with value by focusing on compliance and cybersecurity, ensuring strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Authentication Systems (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Vanta

Ranking in Data Governance

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compliance Consulting (1st), Compliance Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vanta is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Anupam Dutta

Team Lead- Sr. Linux administrator-Kubernetes-DevOps at ExpressRCM

Helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, but the customer support needs improvement

It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop. We use JEM Cloud, which is a SaaS solution, and sometimes it experiences access issues. With Vanta, we can work on resolving these issues and ensuring policy compliance. Vanta also helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, which are essential for our documentation and communication requirements, ultimately ensuring enterprise software policy compliance. In my role, which primarily involves IT responsibilities, I often deal with various policies. There are instances where specific policies, especially those related to quality, may not be implemented correctly. This primarily occurs with mainframes and devices owned by particular users. In such cases, Vanta helps us enable these policies on the devices and assign them to the relevant users. It also highlights when certain policies, such as version 86.x, are not assigned through SAP. Vanta provides guidance on configuring and mitigating these issues. Additionally, it helps us with GitHub account provisioning and deprovisioning, as well as managing GitHub and Google Workspace Flex. We also use the 1Password password manager, which Vanta assists in overseeing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

"It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks."

"They integrate into New Relic as a performance monitoring tool."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta would be the time savings from the automation and the continuous compliance monitoring once set up."

"Task management and vendor assurance are the most valuable features. It is also an easy tool to use."

"The product has provided automated security controls for our cloud provider. It helps to automate security checks. Vanta offers a list of things that can be done to achieve ISO 27001 compliance."

Cons

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."

"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

"Some of the tool's automated tests do not work the way it should."

"There is a delay with customer support and they are unsure of the answers we need."

"Currently, Vanta's user access review module is still in development, and we've been giving them continuous feedback to help them improve that."

"The main area for improvement in Vanta is the user interface's refresh rate."

"Scalability could be improved."

"They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, however, the outline is a little sketchy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The product is costly."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

"Vanta is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

University

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Vanta?

The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vanta?

Every product has a lot of areas to improve. They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, for example, however, the outline is a little sketchy. The system description has to hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vanta?

We're trying to get SOC 2 compliance, and we're trying to get HIPAA compliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 18% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Drata vs Vanta

Compared 24% of the time

Thoropass vs Vanta

Compared 13% of the time

Sprinto vs Vanta

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Vanta

Compared 9% of the time

Wiz vs Vanta

Compared 8% of the time

More Vanta Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

August 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Compliance Management

July 2025

Download Vanta product report

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

No data available

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Vanta helps companies scale security practices and automate compliance for the industry’s most sought after standards - SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA.

Vanta

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Care Directives, Shortcut , Nayya, Heizenrader, Treasury Prime

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta

July 2025

Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Vanta report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.