Drata vs Vanta comparison

Drata and Vanta are both solutions in the Compliance Management category. Drata is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Vanta is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Drata holds a 7.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Vanta’s 11.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Drata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vanta users who would recommend it.

Drata

Read 8 Drata reviews

2,372 Views
2,065 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Vanta

Read 6 Vanta reviews

3,006 Views
2,667 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Drata

Vanta

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Vanta and Drata are competing in the field of compliance automation. Vanta appears to have the upper hand with its competitive pricing and superior support, while Drata excels with comprehensive feature offerings.

Features: Vanta automates SOC 2 compliance and offers real-time security monitoring. It provides prebuilt control frameworks for fast compliance, real-time API integration with tools like AWS and New Relic, and insightful policy compliance features for GitHub and Google Workspace. Drata offers robust integration capabilities, automated evidence collection for multiple compliance standards, and advanced integrations with cloud services and HR systems. It simplifies audits with automatic control management and organizational efficiency during audits.

Room for Improvement: Vanta could enhance its handling of access issues in SaaS environments like JEM Cloud and better implement quality policies on specific devices. It could also improve API integration to reduce configuration challenges. Drata might enhance its basic package with more advanced features, improve its AI-generated code suggestions for fixing issues, and expand real-time functionality without upsell options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vanta stands out for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, favoring quick integration and continued support. Drata offers an efficient deployment process with proactive customer service that provides extensive setup guidance, likely appealing to enterprises requiring hands-on assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Vanta offers competitive setup costs, presenting a potential quicker ROI, particularly for small to mid-sized businesses. Drata, priced higher upfront, promises significant returns for organizations dealing with multiple compliance frameworks due to its extensive automation capabilities. While Vanta may be more cost-effective for singular compliance focuses, Drata’s higher investment can be justified for broader compliance needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Drata vs. Vanta Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Drata

Ranking in Compliance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vanta

Ranking in Compliance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compliance Consulting (1st), Data Governance (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Drata is 7.2%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vanta is 11.9%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compliance Management

Featured Reviews

Johnny Chen

SecOps Engineer III at FINIX PAYMENTS, INC

Collects and stores compliance evidence and documentation for you using native integrations with your tech stack.

There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations.

Read full review

Anupam Dutta

Team Lead- Sr. Linux administrator-Kubernetes-DevOps at ExpressRCM

Helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, but the customer support needs improvement

It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop. We use JEM Cloud, which is a SaaS solution, and sometimes it experiences access issues. With Vanta, we can work on resolving these issues and ensuring policy compliance. Vanta also helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, which are essential for our documentation and communication requirements, ultimately ensuring enterprise software policy compliance. In my role, which primarily involves IT responsibilities, I often deal with various policies. There are instances where specific policies, especially those related to quality, may not be implemented correctly. This primarily occurs with mainframes and devices owned by particular users. In such cases, Vanta helps us enable these policies on the devices and assign them to the relevant users. It also highlights when certain policies, such as version 86.x, are not assigned through SAP. Vanta provides guidance on configuring and mitigating these issues. Additionally, it helps us with GitHub account provisioning and deprovisioning, as well as managing GitHub and Google Workspace Flex. We also use the 1Password password manager, which Vanta assists in overseeing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is 100 percent friendly to use."

"Drata keeps adding new features, allowing us to build our entire InfoSec program within it. Adding new components and evidence for different audits is easy. Drata also integrates with various software, like ticketing systems, source code control, and cloud platforms, continuously pulling evidence from these integrations. Without a GRC tool with these integrations, we used to gather evidence from different software during audits manually. Drata has a significant impact on our security posture management. Previously, Drata had features for security posture management, primarily through integration with AWS. For example, it would scan AWS for specific security requirements, like ensuring all S3 buckets are private. It will be reported on the Drata platform if it finds a public bucket. Recently, Drata introduced a new feature that uses an infrastructure-as-code approach. This feature detects issues and provides AI-generated suggestions for fixing them. If an organization uses infrastructure-as-code solutions like Terraform, Drata will suggest changes to the Terraform code to address the issues. You can then review and apply these changes to fix the problems. This is particularly useful when dealing with many topics, as it helps automate and speed up the process of implementing fixes. However, this AI-generated code feature is part of Drata’s upsell options. The basic version of Drata offers limited capabilities compared to the advanced features available with a paid upgrade. Even without this new feature, Drata's security posture management is valuable, as it scans cloud environments for deviations from defined security baselines. Many tools offer similar capabilities, but Drata’s new feature that translates issues into actionable fixes is a notable advancement. This benefits teams with the capability and resources to use this tool effectively."

"Drata helped us publish our ISO and SOC reports, which was essential for the acquisition. The challenge now is whether Drata can scale up to meet the needs of a larger company, which already has tools like Intune to enforce laptop encryption. Drata is excellent for startups and small—to medium-sized companies but may face challenges in larger organizations with multiple environments."

"Drata offers APIs for every clause so that it can integrate into various platforms."

"The way the tool's controls are linked to the framework, specifically with SAST and HIPAA frameworks or any other frameworks, is really good."

"Drata helps eliminate evidence gathering and makes assigning different activities to different team members easier, simplifying compliance and audit processes. In Pennsylvania, we're putting in thousands of hours. Drata improves our security posture by reducing extra work, allowing us to focus on other security directives. I like the control editing and task management features the most. It's easy to use, but it's also easy for people to think they don't need security experts if they have it."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta would be the time savings from the automation and the continuous compliance monitoring once set up."

"The product has provided automated security controls for our cloud provider. It helps to automate security checks. Vanta offers a list of things that can be done to achieve ISO 27001 compliance."

"Task management and vendor assurance are the most valuable features. It is also an easy tool to use."

"It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop."

"They integrate into New Relic as a performance monitoring tool."

Cons

"One of the challenges with Drata is that if you're paying for a subscription to ISO 27001, you must undergo a risk assessment. You should have access to all necessary modules on the platform to achieve your compliance posture and certification."

"There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations."

"The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate."

"The thing with Drata is you cannot open multiple tabs on the same interface or the same desktop,"

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest better marketing since the industry tends to market these tools as security experts, which isn't true."

"The solution is quite costly."

"The product can improve in its API documentation area."

"Some of the tool's automated tests do not work the way it should."

"Scalability could be improved."

"There is a delay with customer support and they are unsure of the answers we need."

"They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, however, the outline is a little sketchy."

"The main area for improvement in Vanta is the user interface's refresh rate."

"Currently, Vanta's user access review module is still in development, and we've been giving them continuous feedback to help them improve that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's one of the more expensive options, but I think it's worth the money if you can afford it."

"I remember that my company used to pay 25,000 USD to use the product...The product's cost is really high, but it is a powerful tool."

"Drata's pricing is quite reasonable. Compared to other tools in the market, including its biggest competitor, Vanta, Drata is much cheaper. Even compared to other tools like AuditBoard, which aren’t as good, Drata’s price remains competitive."

"Vanta is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Drata?

The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate. It requires a certain level of development understanding from companies. Improvements could be in the area of reducing ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Drata?

I have been deploying all the services to Australia and USA. These are for customer compliance on HIPAA, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and similar standards.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Drata?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Vanta?

The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vanta?

Every product has a lot of areas to improve. They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, for example, however, the outline is a little sketchy. The system description has to hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vanta?

We're trying to get SOC 2 compliance, and we're trying to get HIPAA compliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sprinto vs Drata

Compared 12% of the time

Thoropass vs Drata

Compared 7% of the time

Hyperproof vs Drata

Compared 5% of the time

Secureframe Comply vs Drata

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Drata

Compared 4% of the time

More Drata Competitors

Sprinto vs Vanta

Compared 18% of the time

Wiz vs Vanta

Compared 9% of the time

Thoropass vs Vanta

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Vanta

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Vanta

Compared 7% of the time

More Vanta Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Drata

April 2025

Download Drata product report

Buyer's Guide

Compliance Management

April 2025

Download Vanta product report

Overview

Drata is a powerful tool for automating compliance processes, effectively reducing audit preparation time and continuously monitoring security controls. It is highly valued for its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing tech stacks and manage security for remote teams, ensuring adherence to standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA. Drata enhances organizational efficiency, improves workflows, and supports real-time compliance monitoring, making compliance management less stressful and more accurate.

Drata

Vanta helps companies scale security practices and automate compliance for the industry’s most sought after standards - SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA.

Vanta

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Care Directives, Shortcut , Nayya, Heizenrader, Treasury Prime

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

April 2025

Free Report: Drata vs. Vanta

Find out what your peers are saying about Drata vs. Vanta and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Drata vs. Vanta report.

See our list of best Compliance Management vendors.

We monitor all Compliance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.