Drata vs Vanta comparison

Drata and Vanta are both solutions in the Compliance Management category. Drata is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7, while Vanta is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Drata holds a 6.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Vanta’s 10.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Drata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vanta users who would recommend it.

Drata

Read 9 Drata reviews

1,648 Views
1,648 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Vanta

Read 7 Vanta reviews

2,640 Views
2,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Drata

Vanta

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Vanta and Drata compete in the compliance automation market, focusing on security and compliance management for businesses. Drata has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite its higher pricing compared to Vanta.

Features: Vanta offers streamlined compliance management, prebuilt control frameworks, and automated evidence collection, beneficial for startups and small enterprises. Drata provides real-time monitoring, extensive integrations with cloud and security tools, and a proactive approach to compliance through automated control management. Drata's Audit Hub and flexible integration options further enhance its features for large businesses.

Room for Improvement: Vanta could improve in providing more robust integration options and reducing manual setup requirements. Enhancing its monitoring capabilities could help better cater to larger organizations. Drata, while comprehensive, might better accommodate smaller businesses by offering more cost-effective options. Improving flexibility in infrastructure requirements and integration across various services could also benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vanta is praised for its straightforward setup process, favorable for smaller businesses with its simplified deployment. Drata's more in-depth deployment model accommodates extensive integrations, requiring a higher initial investment. Both products offer responsive customer service, although Drata provides additional resources and support structure, aiding broader enterprise implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Vanta is typically more cost-effective, appealing to startups and small businesses for quick compliance solutions. Drata's higher initial costs are justified for organizations seeking long-term investment in extensive compliance capabilities. The advanced features and integration capabilities of Drata offer substantial ROI, particularly for larger businesses focused on comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Drata vs. Vanta Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,209 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Drata

Ranking in Compliance Management

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vanta

Ranking in Compliance Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compliance Consulting (3rd), Data Governance (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Drata is 6.6%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vanta is 10.3%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compliance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Vanta	10.3%
Drata	6.6%
Other	83.1%

Compliance Management

Featured Reviews

Johnny Chen

SecOps Engineer III at FINIX PAYMENTS, INC

Collects and stores compliance evidence and documentation for you using native integrations with your tech stack.

There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations.

Read full review

Anas Rifai

DevOps Engineer / SRE at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Has improved our compliance workflow and helped identify and fix security vulnerabilities

The only thing I wish for regarding the features is better RBAC. Permissions for platform users have been an issue. We've had to give admin access to Vanta for another team member to view all items. It would be great if the permissions of Vanta platform users had more verbosity to them, more dynamic. To improve Vanta, I think the refresh after remediation takes place could be controlled more. If it could be faster, that would be great. Besides the user permissions and the refreshing, which are improvements rather than issues, the rest looks fine. Vanta has been really nice, with a nice user experience, clear layout, and very reasonable recommendations compared to other platforms we've tried.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is 100 percent friendly to use."

"Drata offers APIs for every clause so that it can integrate into various platforms."

"Drata helps eliminate evidence gathering and makes assigning different activities to different team members easier, simplifying compliance and audit processes. In Pennsylvania, we're putting in thousands of hours. Drata improves our security posture by reducing extra work, allowing us to focus on other security directives. I like the control editing and task management features the most. It's easy to use, but it's also easy for people to think they don't need security experts if they have it."

"The way the tool's controls are linked to the framework, specifically with SAST and HIPAA frameworks or any other frameworks, is really good."

"Drata helped us publish our ISO and SOC reports, which was essential for the acquisition. The challenge now is whether Drata can scale up to meet the needs of a larger company, which already has tools like Intune to enforce laptop encryption. Drata is excellent for startups and small—to medium-sized companies but may face challenges in larger organizations with multiple environments."

"My experience with customer support was good; they were responsive, but they didn't ever get us to a solution that worked."

"Drata keeps adding new features, allowing us to build our entire InfoSec program within it. Adding new components and evidence for different audits is easy. Drata also integrates with various software, like ticketing systems, source code control, and cloud platforms, continuously pulling evidence from these integrations. Without a GRC tool with these integrations, we used to gather evidence from different software during audits manually. Drata has a significant impact on our security posture management. Previously, Drata had features for security posture management, primarily through integration with AWS. For example, it would scan AWS for specific security requirements, like ensuring all S3 buckets are private. It will be reported on the Drata platform if it finds a public bucket. Recently, Drata introduced a new feature that uses an infrastructure-as-code approach. This feature detects issues and provides AI-generated suggestions for fixing them. If an organization uses infrastructure-as-code solutions like Terraform, Drata will suggest changes to the Terraform code to address the issues. You can then review and apply these changes to fix the problems. This is particularly useful when dealing with many topics, as it helps automate and speed up the process of implementing fixes. However, this AI-generated code feature is part of Drata’s upsell options. The basic version of Drata offers limited capabilities compared to the advanced features available with a paid upgrade. Even without this new feature, Drata's security posture management is valuable, as it scans cloud environments for deviations from defined security baselines. Many tools offer similar capabilities, but Drata’s new feature that translates issues into actionable fixes is a notable advancement. This benefits teams with the capability and resources to use this tool effectively."

"Task management and vendor assurance are the most valuable features. It is also an easy tool to use."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta would be the time savings from the automation and the continuous compliance monitoring once set up."

"After implementing those changes with Vanta, we tracked specific outcomes and metrics and improved compliance scores, which we can see in Vanta."

"It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks."

"They integrate into New Relic as a performance monitoring tool."

"The product has provided automated security controls for our cloud provider. It helps to automate security checks. Vanta offers a list of things that can be done to achieve ISO 27001 compliance."

Cons

"The product can improve in its API documentation area."

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest better marketing since the industry tends to market these tools as security experts, which isn't true."

"The solution is quite costly."

"Drata has impacted our organization negatively, as it made the whole compliance process more complicated and cost me significant time."

"The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate."

"The thing with Drata is you cannot open multiple tabs on the same interface or the same desktop,"

"One of the challenges with Drata is that if you're paying for a subscription to ISO 27001, you must undergo a risk assessment. You should have access to all necessary modules on the platform to achieve your compliance posture and certification."

"There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations."

"Currently, Vanta's user access review module is still in development, and we've been giving them continuous feedback to help them improve that."

"Scalability could be improved."

"There is a delay with customer support and they are unsure of the answers we need."

"Some of the tool's automated tests do not work the way it should."

"The main area for improvement in Vanta is the user interface's refresh rate."

"Permissions for platform users have been an issue. We've had to give admin access to Vanta for another team member to view all items."

"They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, however, the outline is a little sketchy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I remember that my company used to pay 25,000 USD to use the product...The product's cost is really high, but it is a powerful tool."

"Drata's pricing is quite reasonable. Compared to other tools in the market, including its biggest competitor, Vanta, Drata is much cheaper. Even compared to other tools like AuditBoard, which aren’t as good, Drata’s price remains competitive."

"It's one of the more expensive options, but I think it's worth the money if you can afford it."

"Vanta is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Drata?

Drata helped us manage our SOC 2 compliance by automating the monitoring of our infrastructure, but overall, the platform didn't work effectively at all. Being fairly new SOC 2 compliance, understa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Drata?

Our main use case for Drata is to provide a platform for us to manage our SOC 2 compliance.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Drata?

My advice to others looking into using Drata is that I would advise them not to use it. I would rate Drata a 1 out of five because the platform requires that you be a compliance expert and doesn't ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Vanta?

The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vanta?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vanta?

My main use case for Vanta is compliance in general, aiming for an ISO to be compliant with the standards. A specific example of how I use Vanta for ISO compliance is that we have Vanta connected t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Thoropass vs Drata

Compared 14% of the time

Sprinto vs Drata

Compared 11% of the time

Secureframe Comply vs Drata

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Drata

Compared 6% of the time

Hyperproof vs Drata

Compared 6% of the time

More Drata Competitors

Thoropass vs Vanta

Compared 12% of the time

Sprinto vs Vanta

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Vanta

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Vanta

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Vanta

Compared 7% of the time

More Vanta Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Drata

November 2025

Download Drata product report

Buyer's Guide

Vanta

October 2025

Download Vanta product report

Overview

Drata is a powerful tool for automating compliance processes, effectively reducing audit preparation time and continuously monitoring security controls. It is highly valued for its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing tech stacks and manage security for remote teams, ensuring adherence to standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA. Drata enhances organizational efficiency, improves workflows, and supports real-time compliance monitoring, making compliance management less stressful and more accurate.

Drata

Vanta helps companies scale security practices and automate compliance for the industry’s most sought after standards - SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA.

Vanta

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Care Directives, Shortcut , Nayya, Heizenrader, Treasury Prime

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

September 2025

Free Report: Drata vs. Vanta

Find out what your peers are saying about Drata vs. Vanta and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Drata vs. Vanta report.

See our list of best Compliance Management vendors.

We monitor all Compliance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.