No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pentest-Tools.com vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pentest-Tools.com
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
47th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Penetration Testing Services (23rd)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Pentest-Tools.com is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 3.0%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional3.0%
Pentest-Tools.com0.5%
Other96.5%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

JagdishPrasad - PeerSpot reviewer
ML Professor at Pune University, Pune
Centralized automation has streamlined vulnerability assessments and improved stakeholder communication
I think that Pentest-Tools.com can be improved in a few ways. As I mentioned before, every software has areas for improvement. Pentest-Tools.com is a strong and mature platform overall, but one area for improvement is deeper customization and workflow automation because while the platform already offers a wide range of scanning capabilities, advanced users would benefit from granular control over the scanning configurations, testing profiles, and automated workflows. Additional options for tailoring assessments to specific environment and organizational requirements could further improve the efficiency and flexibility of the software. Another opportunity lies in expanding the integration with enterprise security ecosystems because many organizations operate complex security environments that include SIEM platforms, ticketing systems, vulnerability management solutions, and DevOps and DevSecOps pipelines. Broader and more seamless integration with these technologies would help organizations to incorporate Pentest-Tools.com more effectively into their existing security operations and continuous monitoring processes. I would also like to see enhancements in historical analysis and trend reporting capabilities. While the current reporting is very useful, additional dashboards that provide long-term visibility into vulnerability trends, remediation progress, and recurring issues and overall security posture improvements would offer valuable strategic insight for management and security leadership teams. Another potential enhancement could be more extensive collaboration features for larger security teams; improving the mechanisms for assigning findings and tracking remediation ownership, managing the review workflow, and facilitating communication among team members could strengthen Pentest-Tools.com's value for enterprise-scale deployment. Overall, these suggestions are intended as enhancements rather than criticisms. Pentest-Tools.com already provides substantial value and performs its core functionality effectively. But the improvements I would like to see include expanded enterprise integration, richer historical analytics, and greater support for modern application architecture along with more advanced automation features that further streamline the security assessment lifecycle. I have tried to cover as much as possible in terms of improvements from my end, and nothing else is coming to mind after that.
MH
Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Pentest-Tools.com has positively impacted my organization in two significant ways."
"Pentest-Tools.com has had a very positive impact by improving the efficiency, consistency, and overall effectiveness of our security assessment processes."
"BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding."
"The intercepting feature is the most valuable."
"Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them."
"When we compare it to other programs that we have such as OWAP Zap, we found Burp to be more suitable."
"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."
"I find all the features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional most useful, particularly the AI enhancement for results and follow-up for retests."
"This is one of the best tools that I'm using; I found this one much better."
"The initial setup is simple."
 

Cons

"One area for improvement is deeper customization and workflow automation because while the platform already offers a wide range of scanning capabilities, advanced users would benefit from granular control over the scanning configurations, testing profiles, and automated workflows."
"Pentest-Tools.com could improve in a couple of areas. First, the reporting flexibility could be enhanced."
"I am from Brazil. The currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep. It is almost six to one. It would be good if it can be sold in the local currency, and its price is cheaper for us."
"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services. A lot of organizations are providing APIs to access their services to support different business models like SaaS. Scanning these APIs is still a challenge for many security product companies."
"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."
"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."
"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."
"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."
"The Initial setup is a bit complex."
"I need the solution to be more user-friendly. The solution needs to be user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."
"This is a value for money product."
"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."
"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."
"We have one license. The price is very nominal."
"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."
"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."
"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.
What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Burp
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Facebook 5. Apple 6. IBM 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. Cisco 10. HP 11. Dell 12. VMware 13. Red Hat 14. SUSE 15. Ubuntu 16. CentOS 17. Fedora 18. Arch Linux 19. Gentoo 20. Slackware 21. Mageia 22. OpenSUSE 23. Manjaro 24. PopOS 25. elementary OS 26. Linux Mint 27. Ubuntu MATE 28. Zorin OS 29. Deepin
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.