Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Parasoft SOAtest vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

Parasoft and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.
Parasoft SOAtest
Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
  • 2,628 Views
  • 946 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 22, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] are competing within software testing and network security testing. Parasoft SOAtest holds the upper hand with its comprehensive features and continuous support.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides test automation, continuous testing, and CI/CD integration, optimizing software quality. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] excelled in network stress and advanced traffic simulation but lacked software testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance user interface intuitiveness and provide more comprehensive tutorial access. It may also improve cloud-based testing options. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] required updates in software testing capabilities and struggled with limited deployment flexibility. More robust technical support would have been useful during its lifecycle.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest integrates seamlessly with environments, aided by strong customer service, ensuring smooth implementation. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL], now discontinued, faced deployment challenges due to its lack of ongoing support, limiting its effectiveness for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest demands significant upfront investment but delivers high ROI through enriched test coverage and risk reduction in software development. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] entailed substantial setup costs, and its end-of-life status detracts from long-term ROI benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (14th)
Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.
Read full review
Jos Badimo - PeerSpot reviewer
Jos Badimo
Director at BAMS
Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The solution is scalable."
"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."
"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."
"We have seen a return on investment."
"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."
"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."
More Parasoft SOAtest pros
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
 

Cons

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."
"The performance could be a bit better."
"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."
"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."
"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."
"The summary reports could be improved."
"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."
"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."
More Parasoft SOAtest cons
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
"They do have a confusing licensing structure."
"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
"The price is around $5,000 USD."
"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
8%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise23
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person work...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?
We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?
The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 11% of the time
SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 10% of the time
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 6% of the time
ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 6% of the time
Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 5% of the time
More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 19% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 6% of the time
Snyk vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
Snyk vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 5% of the time
Fortra's Digital Defense Frontline WAS vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
Fortra's Digital Defense Frontline WAS vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 5% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest
January 2026
Parasoft SOAtest reportDownload Parasoft SOAtest product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
January 2026
Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

SOAtest
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?
  • Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
  • Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
  • User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
  • Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
  • Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.
What benefits should be considered in user reviews?
  • Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
  • Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
  • Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies
 

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
Digicel
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.