We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 17th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 25th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "Powerful and user-friendly". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, ReadyAPI Test, Coverity and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
