We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."
"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Sealights.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
