No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages vs Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Linux 7 | Support by...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
378th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2016 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
508th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Jagadeesh Sanuboina - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Proactive server management has reduced incidents and saves time through automated health checks
One improvement area I identified is reducing manual operational work, such as health checks, file system monitoring, log cleanup, and path validation. I rated Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages 8 out of 10 because I need improvements in automation. I recommend several important improvements. I would suggest moving new builds to Oracle Linux 8 or 9 and avoiding creating new long-term workloads on Oracle Linux 7. I should keep Oracle Linux 7 mainly for existing legacy applications while migration is planned. Another improvement I recommend is modernizing Oracle Linux 7 image lifecycle by not creating new Oracle Linux 7 workloads. I would standardize hardened golden images, automate patching and vulnerability scanning, and migrate applications towards Oracle Linux 8 or 9. For existing Oracle Linux 7 systems, I should maintain an accurate inventory and ensure extended support updates are being applied. This improves security, reliability, governance, and reduces operational effort.
RP
CEO at Ruby Mills Ltd
Familiar platform has supported reliable on-premise file sharing and directory services
I am not currently using virtual machines, but I intend to switch over from VMware, and if I do, I may use the Shielded Virtual Machines feature. I am not using the Nano Server product, so I cannot comment on its impact on reducing server footprint in my organization. I am not working with Windows Containers for managing application deployment. I do not know about the integration capability of Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages with Microsoft Azure, as I do not use the cloud. I would give Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages a rating of eight on a scale from zero to ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Oracle Linux 7 is stable and its similarity to Red Hat makes it easy to use."
"Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages provides a stable and reliable operating system foundation for my critical business applications, and its compatibility with Oracle Database and middleware products is practically important."
"Customer support for Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages is perfect, responding on time and taking care of the users and customers."
"The best features of Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages include stability, reliability, security, and the fact that it is free and open source."
"Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages has positively impacted my organization by making Oracle easier to administer and making database images easier to deploy."
"In terms of stability, performance, and compliance, this is one of the best operating systems I have worked with."
"It makes the job easy, most especially when it comes to installation and setting up RAC environments."
"Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages has positively impacted my organization by improving cost and agility, particularly in making new images available."
"The product is familiar to use, which is a positive aspect."
"I can state that I almost never see crashes or glitches in my experience."
 

Cons

"Sometimes we do have some system performance issues."
"The scalability of Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages can be improved with features from Oracle Linux 9."
"Customer support is very poor and not very good."
"I can face downtime with Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages mainly during kernel patching and reboot activities."
"However, Oracle Linux 7 is outdated, so I recommend users to use the latest version."
"I suggest improving Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages by implementing faster support response time, especially for critical production incidents, and providing clearer lifecycle guidance and better communication about security updates, support timelines, and migration recommendations."
"I would not agree that Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is 99% stable and reliable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages?
The overall installation experience could be enhanced by expanding the options available during initial setup, particularly regarding software repositories, application packages, and virtualization...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Linux 7 | Support by SupportedImages?
I specialize in working with Docker and Oracle Database (version 7 onwards), leveraging official Oracle images to build custom containers based on Oracle Linux, as well as performing general databa...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is reasonable in price, and I think the license is acceptable.
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I am not certain what improvements could be made to Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages, but perhaps some built-in security features could help. Additional securi...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I work for a company that supports a ServiceNow platform integrated with other platforms, so I cannot specify whether I am a user, partner, integrator, or consultant for Microsoft. Our client use c...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.