Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Fusion Service vs Zoho CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Fusion Service enhances customer experience, reduces costs, and offers substantial ROI, supported by integrated reporting and strong partnerships.
Sentiment score
5.3
Zoho CRM enhances sales and efficiency with automation, reducing costs and boosting productivity through real-time reporting and streamlined operations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Oracle Fusion Service's customer support is knowledgeable but slow, with service rated 7-9/10 and regional disparities noted.
Sentiment score
6.7
Zoho CRM support varies in quality and availability, with mixed reviews on communication and resolution efficiency across regions.
Customer service varies as sometimes I receive a good response, and other times I need to escalate issues and involve engineers from Oracle in an OWC session.
The 1.5 deduction from 10 is due to cultural communication differences based on where we're getting the support, as sometimes it takes a couple of times to communicate clearly enough for them to understand the issue.
There are multiple blogs and articles available online for self-help.
Sometimes, they don't understand what my actual needs are.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Fusion Service is highly scalable, supporting seamless expansion for all organization sizes with high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
7.8
Zoho CRM is scalable and integrates well for SMEs, though additional investments may be needed for full customization.
Initially, we had ten ERPs, and I have added more since.
The system is easy to understand, implement coding, and conduct training.
Zoho CRM is quite scalable; I have worked with clients who started with ten companies and have scaled up to managing 500 employees effectively within Zoho CRM.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle Fusion Service is highly stable, supporting large-scale operations with minimal disruptions and proactive management of minor outages.
Sentiment score
7.7
Zoho CRM is praised for stability and reliability, with minor speed issues, earning high user satisfaction ratings overall.
I find Zoho CRM to be 100% stable and reliable as far as I know.
I would rate the stability of Zoho CRM as a nine.
 

Room For Improvement

Oracle Fusion Service needs improvements in user experience, pricing, integration, performance, documentation, and modern functionalities for large enterprises.
Zoho CRM needs better integration, user interface, pricing, scalability, automation, and improved customer support and documentation.
Simpler integration capabilities.
When dealing with bulk data uploads via a BDI process, some records occasionally fail, requiring me to debug and reprocess them.
The platform does not save code versions similar to GitHub, where you can compare new versions with previous ones.
Some organizations may prefer not to have their data on the internet since Zoho CRM runs as a cloud service.
The main improvement needed for Zoho CRM is introducing SQL code for reports, similar to what's in Zoho Analytics.
 

Setup Cost

Oracle Fusion Service offers flexible pricing but can be costly for small businesses; efficient license management is essential.
Zoho CRM provides flexible and competitive pricing, starting at $12 per user, with comprehensive plans like Zoho One available.
I think it's expensive, yet it does not pose a threat, making it costly for my enterprise.
Zoho CRM and all of Zoho's software are quite affordable because they are specifically designed for small and medium businesses.
 

Valuable Features

Oracle Fusion Service enhances customer interaction and streamlines operations with omni-channel communication, integration, automation, and flexible customization.
Zoho CRM offers customization, integration, analytics, and affordability, making it ideal for startups and businesses needing robust tools.
There are ERP connectors available for Oracle middleware, enabling seamless integration through a drag-and-drop interface.
There is also a focus on maintaining efficiency, and it is a significant time saver.
The most valuable aspect of CRMs, including Zoho CRM, Salesforce, and Microsoft Dynamics, is automation capabilities.
The most valuable features of Zoho CRM so far include Deluge script, which are custom functions, workflows which are mostly used while creating flows, and custom layouts which are used when adding extra fields or validations.
Zoho CRM has many valuable automation features such as auto-reply, auto-mail, and reminders for customers about last offers and upcoming processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (4th), Marketing Management (7th)
Zoho CRM
Ranking in CRM
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Opportunity Management (5th), Sales Force Automation (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Oracle Fusion Service is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoho CRM is 3.1%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

MahaboobPasha - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration enhances efficiency with good ERP Fusion Console that helps with centralization
When it comes to ERP Cloud, performance has always been an issue, especially when calling an API or a VIP publisher. I experience timeouts, which Oracle needs to improve. There have been many service requests around this, particularly last year. Although progress has been made, performance is still a concern for me. When dealing with bulk data uploads via a BDI process, some records occasionally fail, requiring me to debug and reprocess them. Enhanced performance is something that I would be interested in.
Romani Labib - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization options empower workflow management, though support understanding can be enhanced
Currently, I am still working with Azure and I use the Azure products for my current work. I use Azure Active Directory. I don't use products like App Service from Azure or Azure Logic Apps, Front Door, but I think it's very straightforward. Once I take the first step to use Azure, I can track myself to use another application, program, or module in Azure. I use Office 365 because we actually have Exchange mail server 2019 on premises. In the last few months, I upgraded from Exchange on premise to use Office 365, which is faster, easier to troubleshoot, and more secure. I use Remote Desktop Services (RDS) as the best solution because I make a private server in my data center room. I have many users that need to access the internet, so I don't join the server to my domain because if I have any malware or other attacks, I can resolve it easily without any damage to my internal network. Microsoft RDS is more user-friendly and easier to use compared to RDS from Azure Microsoft or another provider. I purchase Microsoft Remote Desktop Services directly from Microsoft. I have had an MCSE and Microsoft account for 15 years. I work with SharePoint and Exchange, which are famous applications through Microsoft and Office 365. For daily tasks, I use Microsoft tools and Linux tools because I have applications like CRM, ERP, and HRM running over CentOS, an operating system by Linux. Regarding CentOS, in Egypt, we have issues paying for things from the internet, especially due to the large margin between US dollars and Egyptian pounds. CentOS is totally free from the internet, so I create ISO and install it on the server to use all features, policies, and security modules. Currently, I use 3CX as voice solutions, and Asterisk is the Linux platform I use, along with firewalls by Linux called pfSense. All data centers in my company have products between Microsoft and Linux systems. For DNS, I use deDNS to make remote access or subdomains from deDNS organization. Sometimes, I pay for a main domain from HostGator and re-route the domain to my data centers. Based on other competitors, I would rate Zoho CRM's price as a five, as it has a middle-range price compared to others. Overall, I rate Zoho CRM a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
8%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
I would like to see more AI usage, enhanced personalization capabilities, and simpler integration capabilities.
What do you like most about Zoho CRM?
Zoho CRM integrates easily with customer service workflows.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoho CRM?
I rate the pricing as a five out of ten, as it offers good value for money.
What needs improvement with Zoho CRM?
The UX for the product in general is probably below standard compared to some of the other CRMs.
 

Also Known As

Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
JetHub, Anderson Sales Advantage, ActionCoach, Milagro Advisory Group, TECO Pneumatic, Proteomics Consult
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Fusion Service vs. Zoho CRM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.