We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle Essbase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's user friendly."
"I like that it's stable."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager eight out of 10 for stability."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager has eased the responsibilities among our DBAs. We can now assign individual tasks to separate DBAs."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"Unlike relational, where you're linking together multiple tables, with Essbase, you basically define what the dimensions are beforehand, and you define the hierarchy, and then load the data. This allows you to do a pretty sophisticated analysis so that you can drill into it and slice and dice the data."
"It is highly efficient and easily scalable, particularly for handling large databases."
"I have found the most valuable aspect is the user-friendly environment and current features."
"Essbase is extremely stable and low-maintenance."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"It helps us fetch specific data sets per users' requirements."
"The solution can handle a large volume of data."
"We could use it but definitely with some effort we can streamline much better and sometimes some box here and there, like 13C you have to really wait, but there are great features. Just have to make sure it is a stable product."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"The fact that Oracle Enterprise Manager is an expensive solution is a matter of concern and needs to be considered for improvement."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"The ability to drive external reporting out for development could be improved."
"Essbase has a programming language, and it has a couple of functions to do forecasting, however, their feature set for that is not that good."
"The initial setup could be simplified."
"The initial setup is pretty complex."
"They should improve the solution's performance."
"There is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness."
"I would like to see an integration with application performance management and a version control management tool."
"It's an expensive product to use."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 122 reviews while Oracle Essbase is ranked 10th in Database Development and Management with 10 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Oracle Essbase is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Essbase writes "It is easy to use and receives patch updates on regular intervals ". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics, whereas Oracle Essbase is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, SAP Analytics Cloud, Oracle Analytics Cloud and Tableau. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. Oracle Essbase report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.