OpenText UFT One vs SeleniumBox (SBOX) comparison

OpenText and Element34 are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Element34 is ranked #46. OpenText holds a 9.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Element34’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText UFT One

Read 92 OpenText UFT One reviews

8,962 Views
5,520 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SeleniumBox (SBOX)

50 Views
16 Comparison Views

OpenText UFT One

SeleniumBox (SBOX)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and SeleniumBox (SBOX) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,863 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

SeleniumBox (SBOX)

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

46th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.2%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SeleniumBox (SBOX) is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

Sep 29, 2022

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Use SeleniumBox (SBOX)?

Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,863 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

September 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download SeleniumBox (SBOX) product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Video not available

Element34

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Element34 SeleniumBox (SBOX) is the most advanced on-premise enterprise testing grid. Supporting testing frameworks like Selenium, Appium and Playwright, SBOX is easy to deploy, and is designed to keep your data secure right within the infrastructure of your choice.

Advantages:

∙ Security - Runs inside your private corporate network

∙ Compliance - No data leaves your network

∙ Scalability - Built for scale from day one

∙ Performance - Low latency & parallel testing reduces time of test runs

∙ Cost Effective - Licensing costs don't increase as test volume grows

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,863 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.