OpenText Functional Testing and SeleniumBox are competing products in automated testing. SeleniumBox appears to have the upper hand due to its enhanced functionality and robust features.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides comprehensive testing capabilities, detailed test design, and execution tools. SeleniumBox offers cloud-based solutions, quick integrations with CI/CD processes, and focuses on streamlined scalability and integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive documentation and strong customer guidance. SeleniumBox is known for its seamless integration within cloud environments and provides flexible infrastructure options, emphasizing ease in cloud adaptability.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing presents a competitive initial setup cost with significant long-term savings potential. SeleniumBox requires a higher upfront investment but promises superior returns through efficient and scalable testing solutions. OpenText targets cost-conscious implementations, while SeleniumBox appeals to enterprises prioritizing advanced features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| SeleniumBox (SBOX) | 0.1% |
| Other | 91.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Element34 SeleniumBox (SBOX) is the most advanced on-premise enterprise testing grid. Supporting testing frameworks like Selenium, Appium and Playwright, SBOX is easy to deploy, and is designed to keep your data secure right within the infrastructure of your choice.
Advantages:
∙ Security - Runs inside your private corporate network
∙ Compliance - No data leaves your network
∙ Scalability - Built for scale from day one
∙ Performance - Low latency & parallel testing reduces time of test runs
∙ Cost Effective - Licensing costs don't increase as test volume grows
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
