OpenText UFT Developer and ReadyAPI compete in the software testing domain, each offering distinct advantages. UFT Developer is better suited for situations demanding extensive multi-platform support and integration in development environments, while ReadyAPI has an edge in API testing effectiveness and user-friendliness.
Features: OpenText UFT Developer supports complex algorithms and containerization, has seamless integration with Eclipse and Visual Studio, and offers wide multi-platform flexibility. ReadyAPI provides robust API testing across functional, load, and security aspects, integrates well with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, and supports diverse API types efficiently.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Developer can improve open-source platform integrations, boost multi-browser support, and simplify scripting requirements. ReadyAPI could enhance load testing features, streamline UI complexity, and broaden protocol support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Developer and ReadyAPI both offer on-premises and cloud deployment options. UFT Developer requires more responsive customer service support, and ReadyAPI’s customer service experience is inconsistent.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Developer is considered expensive, with floating license costs above $10,000, yet offers significant ROI for extensive organizational use. ReadyAPI's flexible and competitive pricing is less expensive, positively impacting time-to-market metrics.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework, and they work well together.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
