OpenText Trading Grid vs Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Trading Grid
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (10th), Cloud Data Integration (32nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (21st)
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2022
Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines
The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.
RR
Mar 2, 2023
If it doesn't connect out-of-the-box to a specific technology, we can add a new technology into it
ODI has the ability to connect to virtually any technology out there. If it does not connect out-of-the-box, we can very easily add a new technology into it. This flexibility gives a tremendous developmental advantage to its users, which can use ODI as the official ETL tool for any kind of integration project. Its Knowledge Modules (KMs) may abstract the “how” portion of integrations, allowing the users to focus on the “what” that needs to be done. It can be easily used by either young ETL developers or expert professionals. For resumes, the ease of use for young professionals and its great development flexibility for expert professionals make it a great product to be used for every ETL project out there.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement."
"​The installation of the client ODI Studio is easy.​"
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is that it integrates well with almost all technologies currently being used in my company."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the ease of development, you can have a template, and you can onboard transfer very quickly. There's a lot of knowledge modules available that we can use. If you want to connect, for example, a Sibyl, SQL, Oracle, or different products, we don't have to develop them from scratch. They are available, but if it's not, we can go into the marketplace and see if there's a connector there. Having the connector available reduces the amount of hard work needed. We only have to put the inputs and outputs. In some of the products, we use there is already integration available for ODI, which is helpful."
"I do not have to maintain a separate ETL instance. I can change the SQL when something is not performing correctly."
"The product has an ELT approach."
"It has the ability to easily load slowly changing dimensions."
"Besides loading data, we do most of our transformations in ODI."
"Easy to understand, very developer-friendly, and has a big forum community and lots of documentation for support."
 

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better."
"The price needs to be lowered. It's too expensive."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
"ODI could improve by focusing on streamlining its features without unnecessary overhead."
"Stability could be improved because some operators have issues."
"The initial setup is a bit complex compared to other tools."
"Reverse engineering is complicated and challenging to manage."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
"It has been very good. Just recently, I've faced an issue, but I solved it somehow. While integrating with a file, I faced an issue where I wanted output files, and I had used the text field limited quotations, but at the end of the file, there was a line breakage for the last column. So, we just removed the text field because it was not working correctly for us."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is expensive because of the model they use. The cost is for the license and for support."
"The Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) pricing isn't expensive, but it's not cheap, so it's in the middle. I'd rate the pricing as three out of five."
"There is a standard license to use the solution but there are other costs in addition, such as hardware and operating system."
"I have yet to determine the exact figure for Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) pricing, but it has lower pricing than Informatica."
"The solution is very expensive."
"I rate the platform pricing as five out of ten."
"We found that the cost compared to other integration tools is a little high, but the solution works great."
"Per user, it is $900 USD per year, though they will give some discount. However, even a 60% to 70% of discount for each won't help us much. On top of that, there is the perpetual license you must pay at the outset."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Retailer
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
ODI significantly improves data integration and management by allowing customization of data types from various sources like SQL Server databases.
 

Also Known As

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
ODI
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
Griffith University, Kansas City Power & Light, Keste, Raymond James Financial, Valdosta State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.