OpenText ProVision vs Visual Paradigm comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
244 views|159 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Visual Paradigm Logo
6,264 views|4,074 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and Visual Paradigm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.""All the features come as part of a standard license.""The stability of the product is very good."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

"The solution is stable. It hasn't crashed, stopped or caused any issues in any way.""The Visual Paradigm business process forms for designing we good. There was not a lot of configuration for the process diagram.""The most valuable feature of Visual Paradigm is the ability to design form flows, add libraries, create organizational charts, and connect them all together.""What I like best about Visual Paradigm is its simple GUI, especially since I'm a new user. In my two years of experience with this tool, I didn't find it complex because I was able to learn how to use it via YouTube videos. Visual Paradigm is enough for me. I also find the bridging feature in the tool valuable.""It is easy-to-use and it helps understand its data modeling structure through the intuitive user interface.""I find it very user-friendly for my purposes, which is creating business process models that I can publish as HTML pages. It has worked flawlessly for my project, and my clients are able to utilize it as an internal web portal for their process documentation and other needs.""The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.""Some of the most valuable features of this process modeling tool are process simulation and process animation."

More Visual Paradigm Pros →

Cons
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use.""Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

"In terms of room for improvement in Visual Paradigm, I tried looking for one. I'm pleased with the tool, but it would be great if you could integrate Visual Paradigm with more tools. For example, when moving from Visual Paradigm to another tool, such as Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, the process could be improved a bit. Still, I wonder if it's not limited by the standards Visual Paradigm follows, such as XMI files. It could be connected to limitations related to the standards rather than a tool limitation. When you move projects from Visual Paradigm into Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect via XMI files, you lose all your notes from the elements, so this is an area for improvement in Visual Paradigm. TOGAF support is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Visual Paradigm. I'd also like the tool to have ArchiMate support. If both TOGAF and ArchiMate could be supported in Visual Paradigm and made part of a lower level of licensing or cheaper licensing models, that would be best for me.""The product's versioning capability needs improvement.""The solution can be heavy on resource usage.""Visual Paradigm is heavier and has more complexity than one of its competitors, e.g. Lucidchart. It could have been better if it was more simplified.""The user interface is not easy to navigate, so it should be made easier.""The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it.""Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product.""I would like to see the ability to easily export to groupware, such as Atlassian Confluence."

More Visual Paradigm Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license."
  • "You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription."
  • "You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."
  • "The pricing of Visual Paradigm is very appropriate and affordable. There are no hidden costs involved."
  • "This product is fairly cheap, but if you want more complex features, e.g. integration with other products, it does require an additional cost."
  • "Visual Paradigm has two models available. One of them is the educational edition, and another is the business edition. For my personal usage, I use the educational version mostly. In a project, my customers have to purchase a license."
  • "Visual Paradigm costs $99 per license. I chose the cheapest option from the pricing list."
  • "Pricing for Visual Paradigm is a four out of five for me. I'm happy with its pricing."
  • More Visual Paradigm Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
    Top Answer:The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.
    Top Answer:Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product.
    Ranking
    Views
    244
    Comparisons
    159
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    5.0
    7th
    Views
    6,264
    Comparisons
    4,074
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm ProVision
    Learn More
    Visual Paradigm
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
    Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.
    Sample Customers
    Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
    Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    University10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Visual Paradigm is ranked 7th in Business Process Design with 25 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while Visual Paradigm is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Paradigm writes "Very flexible and easy to use with a good pricing model". OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Visual Paradigm is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Lucidchart, Bizagi and No Magic MagicDraw.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.