OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Original Software TestDrive are competitive players in the automated testing market. OpenText is perceived as more favorable in terms of pricing and support, while Original TestDrive is favored for its advanced features.
Features: OpenText offers robust integration with enterprise environments, automated test generation, and suitability for complex projects. Original Software TestDrive provides ease of use, visual test creation, and supports diverse testing workflows with advanced features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a comprehensive deployment model with extensive support, catering to organizations needing technical assistance. Original Software TestDrive offers a simple deployment model and responsive service, making it advantageous for smaller teams.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers favorable setup costs and promising ROI for extensive project-focused businesses. Original Software TestDrive may entail higher initial costs, but its feature depth and intuitive interface ensure robust ROI and long-term cost-effectiveness.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.5% |
Original Software TestDrive | 0.2% |
Other | 97.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 2 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
TestDrive, the only truly code-free test automation tool in the world. Test 4X faster end-to-end across all applications
All significant application vendors, including SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and Salesforce, have moved or are in the process of moving their user interfaces to the browser.
TestDrive not only tests browsers but also client/server and legacy applications, all without the need for high cost, specialized automation engineers.
TestDrive’s unique ability to check every element of every screen makes it the only viable way to run a full regression test.
Result: higher-quality applications, delivered to the market in a shorter period of time.
100% code-free- no need for programming skills Playback timing, screenshots, analysis of all the visible and invisible screen elements are all handled automatically by TestDrive which lets you concentrate on the testing!We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.