"It is very quick and user-friendly."
"A lot of things are valuable. It is free. It has a lot of features, such as report generation and integration with CI/CD, which makes it very competitive with the other paid solutions available in the market. It is a good solution."
"The recording and playback functionality is helpful."
"Very user-friendly and easy to use."
"We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool."
"User-friendly and open source."
"I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools."
"The performance of the solution is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
"Because so much is being done these days with authentication processes, a better system for either getting bearer tokens or some kind of token-based authentication prior to executing APIs would benefit the product. It is there, and you can do things. It is just not real clean at this point. There should be a better authentication process for JMeter or some automation or better guidelines for gaining and utilizing tokens on the fly."
"The installation needs some work. It could be simplified."
"JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training."
"Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script."
"If the solution was GUI based, I believe that it would be more versatile."
"The plug-ins make the reports heavy and they have to be run in non-GUI mode."
"It should start supporting the presentation layer. It currently provides performance testing specifically at the application and API level. It can be extended to the presentation layer, which includes mainly Angular and React frameworks. It should also be easy to use and easy to train people."
"It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations."
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."
Earn 20 points
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.
WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 17 reviews while RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Selenium HQ and Micro Focus UFT Mobile. See our Apache JMeter vs. RadView WebLOAD report.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.