OpenText Data Protector vs Quest NetVault Plus comparison

OpenText and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quest Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,359 Views
719 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Quest NetVault Plus

Read 12 Quest NetVault Plus reviews

1,295 Views
716 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Quest NetVault Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and Quest NetVault Plus compete in the data protection and backup solution category. Quest NetVault Plus appears to have an advantage due to its ease of deployment and flexible backup options.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers integration with systems like Oracle, SAP, and SQL Server, reliable disaster recovery features, and strong deduplication capabilities. Quest NetVault Plus provides a web-based interface for easy deployment, supports multiple databases such as MSSQL, Oracle, and SAP, and offers flexible backup options with VMware integration.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector's interface and user experience need upgrades, reporting capabilities require improvement, and enhanced cloud and virtualization support is necessary. Quest NetVault Plus needs better deduplication, improved security measures, and more efficient handling of infrastructure expansion.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector supports various deployment models focusing on on-premises with some hybrid options, though customer service experiences vary with reports of slow responses. Quest NetVault Plus is primarily on-premises with generally satisfactory customer support, though there are concerns about support timeliness.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector offers flexible licensing but may become costly for small businesses, while being more affordable for enterprises. Quest NetVault Plus provides cheaper licensing, seen as offering better overall value. Both solutions exhibit positive ROI, but challenges in quantifying this exist, often relying on data recovery success rates.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quest NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest NetVault Plus is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Isa Safii

Senior System Engineer at PT. Virtus Technology Indonesia

Comprehensive data protection and reliable backup capabilities enable smooth disaster recovery operations

The features of Quest NetVault Plus ( /products/quest-netvault-plus-reviews ) that are most valuable include the ability to pick up and restore to tape servers and external hard disks. It allows us to pick up from devices and then restore to the same devices or external server storage. Additionally, the application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The file system backup (by far, the most used) is the most valuable feature."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."

"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."

"Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration."

"The solution is easy to use."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"Quest NetVault Plus is quite effective for managing backups across multiple systems because we don't need to log in to the backup server to manage it; it's web-based, so from any system in the network, you can log in and manage everything."

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."

"The user interface is good."

"Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

More Quest NetVault Plus pros

Cons

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"Faster VEAgent Restores"

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."

"It would be ideal if they could improve their level of support."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"The storage capacity is very low."

More Quest NetVault Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"The tool is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

There's always scope for improvement with any backup software we discuss, whether it's Quest NetVault Plus or Backup Exec, and I don't think any software is 100% foolproof or satisfactory. Improvem...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

We have customers in the pharma industry. Our customers' main use cases for this backup are file system backup and different databases such as MySQL, MS SQL, Oracle, and bare metal recovery.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 53% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 36% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 11% of the time

Quest Rapid Recovery vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 11% of the time

vRanger vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 8% of the time

More Quest NetVault Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Download Quest NetVault Plus product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Quest NetVault Plus is used by organizations for efficient backup in environments such as retail machines, VMware, and virtual servers, including Hyper-V. It supports hybrid environments with Nutanix Xi.

Quest NetVault Plus is designed for backing up databases, applications, and security logs in hybrid environments. It includes a universal backup system with deduplication and allows data path mapping. Users install a client agent on PCs and a server agent for recovery tasks. Commonly used in industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus offers a web interface for network-wide access, dashboards for visualization, and reliable stability and reporting features. While appreciated for its backup management and efficient search capabilities, users desire improvements in its web interface and compatibility.

What are the key features of Quest NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locate tables and databases in backups.
Time-Saving Restoration: Speeds up recovery tasks.
Streamlined Management: Manage backups across different locations easily.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers network-wide access via an intuitive web interface.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides clear visibility of backup processes.

What benefits should organizations expect from Quest NetVault Plus?

Stability and Reporting: Reliable backup operations with built-in reporting tools.
Media Utilization: Optimize backup media usage for cost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Plan for storage needs with detailed reports.
Communication: Stay informed with email notifications on backup status.

In industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus is implemented by configuring agents on clients and servers for effective backup and recovery. Its adaptability in hybrid setups with Nutanix Xi enhances server backup management, while its dashboard and reporting capabilities assist in monitoring and optimizing backup workflows across sectors.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.