OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8, while Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Read 17 Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reviews

1,017 Views
697 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete compete in the endpoint protection market. Symantec appears to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive protection features like EDR capabilities, which users find robust.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection features lightweight design, cloud management, and auto-remediation. It integrates AI-driven security to protect endpoints effectively. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete includes firewalls, real-time threat monitoring, and advanced threat defense with EDR capabilities and sandboxing, making it robust for users.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to reduce false positives, enhance reporting, and improve tech support. It also requires better ransomware protection and advanced analytics. Symantec's installation process and system weight need refinement, and improvements are sought in mobile device support and behavior detection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers deployment across public, hybrid, and private clouds, providing flexibility. Users report satisfaction with its customer service despite occasional responsiveness issues. Symantec also offers cloud deployment options and is noted for reliable and responsive customer service, catering to both cloud and on-premise environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is cost-effective with various pricing structures promoting quick ROI and wider adoption. Symantec offers a more variable pricing model, competitive yet costly, viewed favorably for its comprehensive features. Both products show improved customer retention and reduced operational costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Livin Sunil

Information Security Engineer at M.Tech

Provides comprehensive protection with a need for a more intuitive interface

Security Complete comes with antivirus plus EDR, which is a convergence of antivirus and EDR. I have both the antivirus and EDR features constantly, allowing my team's customers to conduct detailed analyses of where attacks have occurred or if any malicious files are present, which devices or files have been targeted. It provides a greater level of view, making it easy for my team to mitigate those particular attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."

"Speed"

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"Setting up Symantec is straightforward. Our DevOps team handled the installation, so I wasn't involved, but it wasn't that complicated. They are competent people with certifications in anti-virus management. They didn't need any training or help from the vendor."

"I like that Symantec can update directories."

"It is a very reliable product."

"In reference to zero-day attacks, we immediately get signatures from the Symantec site. That is good."

"The feature I like the most is the Adaptive Protection... And it does not negatively affect users' activities because we can adapt it and allow binaries that are executed regularly, while forbidding those that are not executed within the company."

"The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats."

"The most valuable features of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete for me are sandboxing and its threat-hunting capabilities."

"I am impressed with the tool's detection response."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete pros

Cons

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."

"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."

"We need more control over when upgrades to the app are rolled out."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Installation and packaging for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete should be improved. Its console is also confusing, so that's another area for improvement."

"The solution should include automatic updates."

"Symantec could have better support for iOS and Android mobile devices."

"An area for improvement in Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is that it needs to be developed more because competitors have started providing EDR and XDR functionalities, but in the product, those are still missing. Another area for improvement in Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is that it needs to be lightweight. Currently, the product is very heavy when compared to other vendors. It takes up too much space on the hard drive and the memory."

"There are some limitations from the cloud security point of view."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover everything on the cloud. It does not cover the workstation emails. There are risks associated with it."

"Enhancements in malware analysis and behavior detection would be beneficial."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete could improve by integrating more easily with other Symantec security products."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is relatively cheap."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"The pricing is high."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is good. It's good value for the money."

"The product's pricing is dependent on partnership levels. The solution's price is competitive compared to other solutions."

"It's cost-effective and well-suited for smaller to midrange companies."

"I'm recommending going with three-year licensing, rather than the yearly licensing option for this product."

"License renewal is not a straightforward process. I have a three-year subscription. It takes a long time to renew the license after three years. It is not proactive on that. The solution is expensive for the coverage that it does. I have to include other products to complement the protection that Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover. We have to pay 18 euros. There are no additional support or maintenance costs."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is not expensive."

"In terms of costs, Symantec Endpoint Security Complete has become costlier compared to how much it was in the past. The cost of the product is very high now. The customer needs to pay extra for additional features, but not for technical support. For example, if you need an email gateway or if you are looking for URL filtering, you have to pay extra, and that's where the costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete become higher."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

Symantec Endpoint Security Full/Complete license is not expensive and advise using the full feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

They could improve the user interface. Currently, everything is pretty good, however, when it comes to the Maniac and Protection, there could be enhancements.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 17% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 70% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

May 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Complete product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

No data available

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.