Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #50 with an average rating of 5.0, while Broadcom is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reviews
  • 1,774 Views
  • 1,579 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security ...
Read 18 Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reviews
  • 1,002 Views
  • 962 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete compete in the endpoint protection market. Symantec appears to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive protection features like EDR capabilities, which users find robust.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection features lightweight design, cloud management, and auto-remediation. It integrates AI-driven security to protect endpoints effectively. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete includes firewalls, real-time threat monitoring, and advanced threat defense with EDR capabilities and sandboxing, making it robust for users.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to reduce false positives, enhance reporting, and improve tech support. It also requires better ransomware protection and advanced analytics. Symantec's installation process and system weight need refinement, and improvements are sought in mobile device support and behavior detection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers deployment across public, hybrid, and private clouds, providing flexibility. Users report satisfaction with its customer service despite occasional responsiveness issues. Symantec also offers cloud deployment options and is noted for reliable and responsive customer service, catering to both cloud and on-premise environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is cost-effective with various pricing structures promoting quick ROI and wider adoption. Symantec offers a more variable pricing model, competitive yet costly, viewed favorably for its comprehensive features. Both products show improved customer retention and reduced operational costs over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
50th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security ...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
32nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete0.6%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​0.8%
Other98.6%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers good UI and documentation
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
Read full review
PetriRajama - PeerSpot reviewer
Has provided strong security foundations but struggles with integration and ongoing compatibility issues
It had its problems. They were rebuilding it while having the old functionality and new functionality layered on top of each other. They were migrating the functionalities to the new solution, which caused significant problems. The mobile device management was not unified with the other endpoint management, creating structural issues.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."
"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."
"Speed"
"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."
"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."
"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."
"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."
"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pros
"Endpoint security platform that provides protection for Active Directory environments, file servers, etc., and offers excellent technical support."
"The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the advanced rate firewall protection, the URL filtering."
"I am impressed with the tool's detection response."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete for me are sandboxing and its threat-hunting capabilities."
"I like that Symantec can update directories."
"One feature I found most valuable in Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is the firewall feature on the endpoint. The firewall feature helps users handle virus outbreaks."
"Setting up Symantec is straightforward. Our DevOps team handled the installation, so I wasn't involved, but it wasn't that complicated. They are competent people with certifications in anti-virus management. They didn't need any training or help from the vendor."
More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete pros
 

Cons

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."
"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."
"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."
"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."
"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."
"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."
"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."
"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ cons
"The Threat Defense for Active Directory feature has a problem in that it is not possible to deploy it within a hybrid management architecture... we would have to migrate all the infrastructure to be managed by the cloud to deploy this feature, so we have not deployed it."
"The solution is a pretty expensive product. While it provides good service, considering the price, it is hard to tell about the benefits."
"The solution should include automatic updates."
"Installation and packaging for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete should be improved. Its console is also confusing, so that's another area for improvement."
"Symantec could have better support for iOS and Android mobile devices."
"There are some limitations from the cloud security point of view."
"They could improve the user interface."
"The product’s scalability must be improved."
More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."
"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."
"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."
"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."
"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."
"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."
"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."
"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pricing and cost advice
"The product's pricing is dependent on partnership levels. The solution's price is competitive compared to other solutions."
"In terms of costs, Symantec Endpoint Security Complete has become costlier compared to how much it was in the past. The cost of the product is very high now. The customer needs to pay extra for additional features, but not for technical support. For example, if you need an email gateway or if you are looking for URL filtering, you have to pay extra, and that's where the costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete become higher."
"License renewal is not a straightforward process. I have a three-year subscription. It takes a long time to renew the license after three years. It is not proactive on that. The solution is expensive for the coverage that it does. I have to include other products to complement the protection that Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover. We have to pay 18 euros. There are no additional support or maintenance costs."
"The pricing is good. It's good value for the money."
"It's cost-effective and well-suited for smaller to midrange companies."
"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is not expensive."
"I'm recommending going with three-year licensing, rather than the yearly licensing option for this product."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?
The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?
Symantec Endpoint Security Full/Complete license is not expensive and advise using the full feature.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?
It had its problems. They were rebuilding it while having the old functionality and new functionality layered on top of each other. They were migrating the functionalities to the new solution, whic...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 21% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 13% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 10% of the time
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Competitors
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Compared 43% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Compared 9% of the time
Malwarebytes Teams vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Logo
Malwarebytes Teams vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Compared 8% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Compared 5% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
September 2025
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reportDownload OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
September 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security Complete product report
 

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
  • AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
  • Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
  • Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
  • Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic
What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
  • Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.