OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

OpenText and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8, while WatchGuard is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Read 28 Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reviews

3,228 Views
2,180 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the cybersecurity market, specifically focusing on endpoint protection. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 appears to have the upper hand with more favorable pricing and support, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers robust features that justify its higher price.

Features: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers advanced threat detection, automated response capabilities, continuous monitoring, real-time incident response, and a cloud-based management console. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides data encryption, multi-layered security, integration with OpenText solutions, and advanced reporting tools.

Room for Improvement: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 can improve its feature set to include more robust data encryption, offer better integration with third-party solutions, and enhance reporting capabilities. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could streamline its deployment process, improve customer service responsiveness, and reduce learning curve for new users to adopt its comprehensive security framework quickly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, facilitating quick setup and technical issue resolution. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection, while integrating well with existing systems, may involve a more complex deployment process, with varying feedback on customer service efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a competitive pricing model, providing cost-effective solutions with significant returns on investment through minimal maintenance and security prowess. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection requires a higher initial investment but offers extensive security measures and integration capabilities, often leading to a favorable long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"I like the Panda Security Adaptive Defense cloud usages. Everything is on a single plane of glass like the dashboards. I also like the information I can get about the computers itself."

"The interface is great."

"Great technical support staff."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."

"It is easy to manage."

"It is stable, and the performance is good."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros

Cons

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."

"They need to offer a clear dashboard so you can see everything everywhere all at once."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

"Their MacOS support isn't that good."

"We do get the odd false positive when we're trying to install the software."

"Occasionally, we suffer from little bugs that give us the wrong message."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

Although it is not a cheap solution, it is satisfying and functional. It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 19% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 23% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 6% of the time

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

May 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

May 2025

Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.