OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Qualibrate comparison

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

734 Views
521 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Qualibrate are both key players in the business process testing category. Qualibrate is deemed to have an advantage due to its robust features, despite some pricing and support aspects favoring OpenText Business Processing Testing.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides extensive testing capabilities, focusing on integration with various enterprise applications. It allows technical and non-technical users, such as business analysts, to participate in test development, improving test case quality. Qualibrate features a user-friendly interface with streamlined test processes, strong collaboration tools, and efficient test planning and execution which operate well with SAP Solution Manager.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Business Processing Testing could enhance its user interface to reduce complexity and improve usability for less technical users. Additionally, simplifying deployment processes and enhancing documentation would be beneficial. Qualibrate could improve by expanding its integration options with more enterprise applications, offering more advanced customization features for testing scripts, and enhancing its analytical and reporting capabilities for better insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers comprehensive deployment options suitable for large enterprises but requires more effort to implement effectively, although its enterprise customer service is reliable. Qualibrate is easier to deploy, with efficient setup processes and responsive customer service, making it attractive for organizations seeking quick and straightforward deployment solutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing involves higher setup costs, which might be justified for enterprises needing significant integration capabilities and large-scale operations. Qualibrate offers a cost-effective setup, showing strong ROI through efficient testing processes suitable for businesses seeking value without high upfront expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: March 2026).

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (19th), Test Automation Tools (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualibrate	1.2%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Reviewer148493

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

More OpenText Business Processing Testing pros

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"If you look at it from an overall perspective, where you look at the time that we typically would spend on testing, then it is probably a bit more like 60 to 70 percent time savings."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"Overall, we are really happy with it."

"With Qualibrate, when we looked at the time and resources we are saving it was €1.5 million per year, mostly because of the move away from manual testing."

More Qualibrate pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

More OpenText Business Processing Testing cons

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

More Qualibrate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 12% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Business Processing Testing

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate