OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Qualibrate comparison

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

1,539 Views
1,154 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Qualibrate are both key players in the business process testing category. Qualibrate is deemed to have an advantage due to its robust features, despite some pricing and support aspects favoring OpenText Business Processing Testing.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides extensive testing capabilities, focusing on integration with various enterprise applications. It allows technical and non-technical users, such as business analysts, to participate in test development, improving test case quality. Qualibrate features a user-friendly interface with streamlined test processes, strong collaboration tools, and efficient test planning and execution which operate well with SAP Solution Manager.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Business Processing Testing could enhance its user interface to reduce complexity and improve usability for less technical users. Additionally, simplifying deployment processes and enhancing documentation would be beneficial. Qualibrate could improve by expanding its integration options with more enterprise applications, offering more advanced customization features for testing scripts, and enhancing its analytical and reporting capabilities for better insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers comprehensive deployment options suitable for large enterprises but requires more effort to implement effectively, although its enterprise customer service is reliable. Qualibrate is easier to deploy, with efficient setup processes and responsive customer service, making it attractive for organizations seeking quick and straightforward deployment solutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing involves higher setup costs, which might be justified for enterprises needing significant integration capabilities and large-scale operations. Qualibrate offers a cost-effective setup, showing strong ROI through efficient testing processes suitable for businesses seeking value without high upfront expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

34th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (21st), Test Automation Tools (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualibrate	1.4%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

it_user1760325

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"We do see the long-term value in terms of time savings and the stress it is going to alleviate for the team."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"If you look at it from an overall perspective, where you look at the time that we typically would spend on testing, then it is probably a bit more like 60 to 70 percent time savings."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

More Qualibrate pros

Cons

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 14% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 9% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Qualibrate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Business Processing Testing

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Qualibrate is a leading solution for test automation, offering a low-code approach that simplifies automation tasks. Its integration with SAP Solution Manager ensures efficient test management, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes.

Qualibrate provides user-friendly features that make test script recording and automation accessible to business personnel. It facilitates the reduction of transactions into end-to-end processes, allowing for seamless changes. The tool's integration with SAP Solution Manager enhances test planning, execution scheduling, and process flow management. Users utilize Qualibrate mainly for regression and user acceptance testing within SAP applications, automating standard change processes, and transitioning from manual to automated testing. Its capability to integrate with systems like ServiceNow and host operations in the cloud highlights its versatility in managing critical applications.

What are Qualibrate's most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies test script recording with low-code features.
SAP Integration: Streamlines test management with SAP Solution Manager.
Test Planning: Offers scheduling tools for test execution.
End-to-End Processes: Allows conversion of transactions into comprehensive processes.
Dummy Data Reduction: Minimizes unnecessary data in testing environments.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces manhours through automation of regression testing.
SAP Optimization: Enhances testing strategies specifically for SAP applications.
Cloud Hosting: Ensures reliable testing of critical applications in the cloud.
System Integration: Seamlessly operates with platforms like ServiceNow.

In industries heavily reliant on SAP applications, Qualibrate plays a key role in transitioning from manual to automated regression testing, significantly reducing development complexity. Organizations employing this tool can expect streamlined operations, especially in sectors requiring frequent updates and changes to SAP environments.

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Qualibrate