OpenText Business Processing Testing vs OpenText UFT One comparison

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText UFT One are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked #40, while OpenText UFT One is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. OpenText Business Processing Testing holds a 0.1% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText UFT One’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText Business Processing Testing users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText UFT One users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

132 Views
37 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

6,480 Views
2,919 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT One and OpenText Business Process Testing are strong competitors in the software testing domain. While UFT One is favored for its extensive automated testing capabilities across multiple technologies, Business Process Testing has an edge in handling complex enterprise environments and process integration.

Features: UFT One provides automated testing for a wide range of applications including web, mobile, and API, with advanced integration features. It offers comprehensive support for various testing scenarios, including GUI and API testing, and includes built-in frameworks like BPT and LeanFT. Business Process Testing focuses on end-to-end business process management, scripting, and execution, catering specifically to enterprises with complex processes and integration needs. It allows for better modular testing by incorporating business components and offers ease of test content reusability.

Room for Improvement: UFT One could enhance its features by integrating more intuitive AI-driven test creation tools and simplifying the setup process for non-technical users. Improved support for cross-platform operations would also be beneficial. Meanwhile, Business Process Testing can improve by streamlining initial setup, enhancing user interface design for better usability, and expanding pre-built components for quicker testing implementation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UFT One provides flexible deployment options with strong customer support, making it adaptable to various business needs. Its deployment is more straightforward for technical testing applications. Business Process Testing, however, emphasizes seamless integration into existing business systems, requiring more detailed configuration and planning, yet also offers robust customer support services for enterprise systems.

Pricing and ROI: UFT One generally entails higher upfront costs due to its extensive feature set, which can deliver significant ROI for companies engaged in comprehensive technical testing. In contrast, Business Process Testing typically has lower initial costs but offers value through its focus on efficient business process testing, potentially resulting in substantial efficiency gains and ROI in enterprise settings.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"It is a stable solution."

"I find UFT One to be very good for thick clients, which are non-browser applications."

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."

"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."

"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."

"The user interface could be improved"

"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."

"There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT."

"The scripting language could be improved. They're currently using Visual Basic, but I think that people need something more advanced, like Python or Java."

"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

May 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText UFT One report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.