OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

OpenText and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.5, while SolarWinds is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.6. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

778 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Read 44 SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor reviews

4,410 Views
2,778 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor compete in the business process and server/application performance monitoring category. SolarWinds appears to have an upper hand in features and ease of deployment, while OpenText is favored for its cost-effectiveness.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText offers robust business process monitoring, strong alert capabilities, and efficient workflows. SolarWinds provides comprehensive server monitoring, extensive application performance tracking, and wide-range integration support.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText users suggest enhancements in reporting tools, dashboards, and real-time analytics. SolarWinds users seek improvements in scalability, reduction in false alerts, and a more intuitive user interface.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText's deployment is complex but has responsive customer support. SolarWinds offers a straightforward deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding its customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText is affordable and provides a solid ROI. SolarWinds, despite its higher costs, is considered worth the price due to its robust capabilities but is sometimes criticized for its expense.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (8th), Active Directory Management (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor	1.3%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

NikhilKalwint

Technical Specialist at ServiceIO

Monitoring over a thousand systems has improved decision making and operational visibility

From an advantage perspective, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is comparatively cheaper from a commercial point of view. It is easy to install and configure, very user-friendly, and quick to get up and running, allowing you to see the early value adds in your organization. It is compatible with most technologies for monitoring with very few chances of incompatibility. Configuration also allows us to monitor all the technical parameters we are looking for, making it a very good experience for us. The alerting feature in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is a main advantage, as it alerts based on threshold breaches and can raise tickets to the ticketing system, send SMS, and email notifications, allowing engineers to work on those tickets to resolve issues and avoid further impact. The visibility into server health is a beneficial feature that I am utilizing. We widely use various application performance metrics in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor such as database monitoring and server monitoring, which are quite good enough for any monitoring solution. We utilize the customizable dashboards in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"We use the solution as a central monitoring tool. We use it to monitor every transaction that has a relation to the organization’s infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."

"The most beneficial aspect of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is its ability to monitor at the application level."

"This product can monitor application environments no matter where they reside and provides capabilities for deep insight into infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its interface, which is used for monitoring."

"Solarwinds has an open database that allows you to do serious integrations. It doesn't matter which service desk you have, you can implement and integrate it with SolarWinds."

"The graphical interfaces, GUI customizations, and alert configurations are impressive."

"The product integrates with Remedy."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pros

Cons

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"Application-based monitoring, such as monitoring within servers like Apache and IIS, has room for improvement."

"It lacks a user experience for measuring things like the end-to-end time for which a user waits for a specific response in the system. In the application layer, it has some very basic stuff. You have to build your own with manuscripts and things like that."

"From an integration point of view, if you want to have a manager of manager kind of layer, that is currently lacking in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor."

"SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor could improve by having a cloud version. They have an observability platform but it still needs to be maintained by us."

"The product does not explain why a problem occurred."

"They should incorporate more artificial intelligence. There should also be more predictive features."

"They are complex to operate; users need to know what they want during setup."

"PerfStack can be made more effective. I am sure SolarWinds already has a plan for the same in coming versions."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"The solution is overpriced in terms of application management."

"Understanding the counts of objects to monitor will determine the licensing need. In terms of pricing, it’s not cheap but it’s not expensive as larger vendors whose products don’t have all the features or integrations."

"I think SolarWinds' pricing is very decent compared to other competitors in the market."

"Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It is just the standard price, but it can vary depending on the current rate of the dollar."

"When compared to other licensed models in the market, it stands out as one of the more cost-effective options."

"Price can always be lower. It is neither on the expensive side nor on the cheap side. We have worked with them for a lot of years, so we get a discount due to the size of the installation."

"I would advise potential buyers to wait until the end of the quarter, end of year, or other time to place orders. There are actually great deals to be had at those times if your budget cycle can match up."

"Pricing is inexpensive, starting at 2440 euros. For that, you get the ability to monitor a couple of nodes and one year of maintenance and support."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

Identifying the problem statement is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There is definitely room for improvement besides simplifying its setup. As a non-technical person, I believe the dashboards could be improved. Everything we use appears on video walls, and we need ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 23% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 18% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

January 2026

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

SolarWinds SAM

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor (SAM) delivers powerful application and server monitoring capabilities for IT pros, enabling them to diagnose and troubleshoot performance issues faster. Do not let slow applications and downtime impact your end-users and business services. Pinpoint the root cause of application issues across various layers of the IT stack. SolarWinds SAM is affordable and easy to deploy, use, and customize. You can automatically discover your system's environment and start monitoring in about an hour. No professional services or consultation needed.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.