We performed a comparison between OpenESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) ."The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."
"The stability has been good."
"The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."
"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."
"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
OpenESB is ranked 14th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 1 review while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 5th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 13 reviews. OpenESB is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Easily define choreography and orchestration with this process-oriented solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Reliable, good support, saves time and reduces data entry errors". OpenESB is most compared with Mule ESB, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and Oracle Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator.
See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
