Opal vs OpenText Identity Manager comparison

Opal Security and OpenText are both solutions in the User Provisioning Software category. Opal Security is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Opal Security holds a 0.9% mindshare in UP, compared to OpenText’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Opal Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Opal

Read 2 Opal reviews

896 Views
206 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Identity Manager

Read 18 OpenText Identity Manager reviews

2,991 Views
1,166 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Opal

OpenText Identity Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Identity Manager and Opal compete in identity management and access control. OpenText has the upper hand in support and pricing satisfaction, while Opal's advanced features appeal to some preferences.

Features: OpenText Identity Manager provides comprehensive policies, role management, and automated workflows essential for large enterprises. Opal specializes in innovative identity verification methods and streamlined user access permissions, distinguishing itself with a modern verification approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Identity Manager offers detailed support that aids implementation for enterprises with complex needs. Opal presents a straightforward deployment model with agile methodologies, providing flexibility for businesses requiring adaptability in dynamic environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Identity Manager is cost-effective for large enterprises, offering a predictable pricing structure and potential for high ROI due to its extensive service features. Opal, while initially perceived as higher in cost, is valued for advanced functionalities providing substantial long-term ROI in environments needing cutting-edge solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opal

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (20th), Access Management (19th)

OpenText Identity Manager

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (15th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the User Provisioning Software category, the mindshare of Opal is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Identity Manager is 3.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Provisioning Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Identity Manager	3.4%
Opal	0.9%
Other	95.7%

User Provisioning Software

Featured Reviews

Pranay Jain

Senior Software Developer at hireHQ

Focused workdays have replaced doomscrolling and now reduce my daily screen time significantly

Opal can be improved in some ways. In the paid version, there are multiple features, but in the freemium version, there are fewer features. The blockage of the application can be more rigorous. Right now, if we play two to three games, then a math game or anything, we are able to remove that lock. It should be more rigorous in some manner, and for some applications, it should be more rigorous. Application-wise rigorousness should be introduced. The different modes are good, but they should be more customizable according to the person. The end goal should meet whatever the objective is, so if the person has used more than six hours, then it should remind the person frequently that this application has used this time and this is an application you should not use. It should give us a timer or some kind of notification that the person will not use it anymore.

Read full review

reviewer2401464

Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Updates systems quickly and does not have a limit on the number of users

NetIQ does not have a limit on the number of users. The tool is secure by nature. It can have more than one billion users. Event-based systems know what has to be changed. SQL-based systems can only change using time and date. Event-based systems provide immediate results, while SQL-based systems need time to sync. It is totally different from a security perspective. Event-based systems can update all the systems in seconds or minutes. Other systems do it within 24 hours. The basic event-based system is AI-driven. It has some kind of robotics and programming. Other tools need programming. I like systems that have prebuilt ideas of security. NetIQ has been in the market for a long period. It has all the systems and connectors. There is not much coding. We just need to configure the products. We need not do any programming. I haven't seen any other product that needs only configuration to do the job. Most products in the market are SQL-based. They need programming. Some service providers who sell other products to customers do not sell NetIQ because they can make more money by selling solutions that need more consultancy and programming. More hours lead to more money.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Opal has positively impacted my organization by reducing stress and increasing effectiveness for all our employees; it works better so all our employees have more time to sleep and they can investigate more."

"Previously, my phone usage was around nine hours and fifteen minutes or more, but it has significantly reduced to around six hours and thirty minutes to seven hours, meaning two and a half to three hours has been reduced after using Opal as my primary screen time blocker."

"NetIQ does not have a limit on the number of users."

"The stability of the NetIQ Identity Manager is good."

"The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with all necessary access on day one through automated provisioning, facilitated by approval workflows."

"The greater strength was to keep the identities synchronized without failures in both attributes and passwords."

"It's a very flexible tool, so you can synchronize multiple sources of data and you have multiple connections to various kinds of systems."

"The most valuable feature of this solution has been the ability for us to integrate a lot of external systems, and the automatic transfer of a lot of identity information. Additionally, the customization is very good."

"I would recommend this product, its quite flexible and quick to start with."

"Identity and access management processes have developed to become automatic and fast."

More OpenText Identity Manager pros

Cons

"Opal can be improved in some ways."

"Scalability becomes an issue if the vision changes from the initial implementation. Not being flexible and having to rewrite quite a bit of code for even a simple added feature makes it difficult."

"NetIQ Identity Manager can improve the bulk account uploads, it's very slow. We work in the education sector, and every year we have approximately 20,000 accounts to create in a very short period, the NetIQ Identity Manager has a problem with this, we need to use a batch job."

"The user facing interfaces are not too friendly and they are also fairly hard to configure."

"Technical support is average. When it's come to complex issues, it takes longer than expected to solve."

"The vendor must provide an easier console for configuring things for smaller customers."

"If it works, Designer is a charm, but it can be a pain to keep updated because of all the Java stuff that regularly goes wrong."

"The problem is the ecosystem. There's not a lot of people that know the product, so it's hard to find someone to work with the product."

"There are some limitations in the custom workflows, mainly in the GUI presentation, but the latest release improved."

More OpenText Identity Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Micro Focus is flexible when it comes to price. The cost varies from customer to customer. There are no additional costs, though. Everything is included."

"The price of the solution is a bit high and could be reduced."

"It would easily help them in getting more market and more customers if more consultants knew about their software. If they could keep it free for schools for teaching purposes, it would be good. I had to pay myself to get it and use it for training. Their competitors are giving it for free. I had to pay for it myself. They are losing market to their competitors."

"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, with one being low price and ten being high price. It is significantly more cost-effective than the major players in the market."

"The solution is quite affordable."

"You just need to be aware that the more systems you connect, the more license fees you have to pay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Opal?

The paid version is a little costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opal?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opal?

The main use case of Opal for me is to reduce my screen time during my work hours, during my wake-up time, and during my sleeping time to improve my focus and feasibility towards my work and my act...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetIQ Identity Manager?

The pricing depends on whether we buy the solution as a service or a license. The license is expensive. If we buy it as a service for a large number of users, it is the cheapest tool we can get. Th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetIQ Identity Manager?

The tool is used mostly in big systems to understand what is happening. There are not many technicians who know how to use the product. The vendor must provide an easier console for configuring thi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetIQ Identity Manager?

NetIQ Directory is the main function of the product. As far as I know, it is the only event test directory that exists. It has all the potential for event-based testing. It has rules, connectors, a...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Opal

Compared 22% of the time

Okta Platform vs Opal

Compared 20% of the time

ConductorOne vs Opal

Compared 14% of the time

Idira IGA vs Opal

Compared 13% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Opal

Compared 13% of the time

More Opal Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 11% of the time

One Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 8% of the time

OpenIAM Identity Governance vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Nexus Smart ID vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Identity Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

June 2026

Download Opal product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Identity Manager

June 2026

Download OpenText Identity Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Novell Identity Manager

Overview

Opal is a comprehensive platform for identity access management and compliance automation. It excels in streamlining access control, audit preparation, and compliance tracking. Key features include an intuitive interface, robust security measures, and real-time collaboration, significantly improving organizational efficiency and productivity.

Opal Security

OpenText Identity Manager provides event-driven capabilities with real-time synchronization and integration across multiple systems. Known for its flexibility, it offers features like password sync, access management, and directory synchronization.

OpenText Identity Manager is a comprehensive identity management platform, designed to support role-based provisioning and seamless integration of external systems. Its notable features include the Designer and Analyzer tools and robust self-service password management, enhancing its usability. Organizations leverage its event-driven architecture for real-time synchronization and detailed tracing, facilitating efficient identity management across different data sources. However, enhancements in Windows OS compatibility, user interface modernization, and cloud support are needed. Training remains crucial, given the system's complexity and unique language.

What are the Key Features of OpenText Identity Manager?

Real-time Synchronization: Event-driven architecture enables instant updates across systems.
Role Based Provisioning: Streamlines managing roles and permissions within organizations.
Flexible Integration: Connects with multiple data sources, enhancing system interoperability.
Password Synchronization: Simplifies password management across platforms.
Access Management: Offers tools to manage permissions and security with ease.

Why Consider OpenText Identity Manager in Reviews?

Comprehensive Support: Offers identity lifecycle management, enhancing user experience.
Security Enhancements: Improves compliance management and access control.
Scalability: Efficiently supports large-scale enterprise environments.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing infrastructure.

In industries ranging from large corporations to local banks, OpenText Identity Manager supports account provisioning and access management, primarily through Active Directory integration. By connecting with applications like Oracle, PeopleSoft, and Office 365, it facilitates lifecycle and compliance management. Its deployment aids training and real-world application with single sign-on options for internal applications, providing a comprehensive identity management solution for diverse environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sheetz

Buyer's Guide

Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager

June 2026

Free Report: Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Opal vs. OpenText Identity Manager report.

See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.