One Identity Safeguard vs StrongDM comparison

One Identity and StrongDM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.2, while StrongDM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. One Identity holds a 3.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to StrongDM’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StrongDM users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,728 Views
2,610 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

StrongDM

Read 2 StrongDM reviews

433 Views
372 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

StrongDM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and StrongDM compete in secure access management. StrongDM appears to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and ease of integration, especially in diverse technology environments.

Features: One Identity Safeguard provides privileged access management, session monitoring, and password vaulting, which enhance security and compliance. StrongDM enables seamless access to databases, servers, and Kubernetes clusters while offering real-time audit logs and simplified user management, emphasizing its flexibility and ease of integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StrongDM is noted for straightforward deployment and quick customer support, facilitating easy setup and issue resolution. One Identity Safeguard demands a more comprehensive deployment process and might require additional customer support interactions, distinguishing StrongDM's advantage in quick deployability and responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard has higher initial setup costs due to its extensive security features, potentially leading to cost savings through long-term risk reduction. StrongDM offers competitive pricing with quicker ROI through efficient deployment and operational benefits, highlighting its balance of cost-efficiency and functionality compared to Safeguard's security investment focus.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (7th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)

StrongDM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 3.6%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

reviewer2589615

Senior Data Engineer at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamlessly manage cloud access with enhanced security features

I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, and Kubernetes resources StrongDM was able to replace the combination of different products we…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most important aspects is that it is very easy to use and install. It is also agentless, so all of the operations happen more smoothly than any other product."

"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."

"The monitoring system is very good."

"It is generally easy-to-use and install."

"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."

"It offers high availability and enables end users to deploy the solution with 99.999 percent uptime, which is crucial in an enterprise environment with a large number of endpoints."

"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."

"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

Cons

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

"Support for One Identity Safeguard could be improved because sometimes the support team doesn't have an answer or solution for some bugs. A feature I found in a competitor would make One Identity Safeguard better, and that is the ability to load balance the traffic in the target."

"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."

"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases. Also, documentation s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 27% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 15% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 42% of the time

Teleport vs StrongDM

Compared 21% of the time

KeeperPAM vs StrongDM

Compared 18% of the time

HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM

Compared 18% of the time

More StrongDM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

August 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

July 2025

Download StrongDM product report

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

StrongDM offers an innovative solution for managing infrastructure access, focusing on security and compliance while ensuring streamlined operations.

StrongDM simplifies infrastructure access by unifying management and auditing capabilities. It provides a seamless way for organizations to quickly secure sensitive data across all environments, enhancing access control without compromising efficiency. With a focus on integrating access data and compliance requirements, StrongDM is designed to meet the needs of security-conscious organizations.

What are standout features of StrongDM?

Access Management: Centralizes access control, reducing complexity.
Auditability: Offers detailed logs for thorough audit trails.
Compliance Support: Ensures compliance with industry standards.
Scalability: Adapts to changes in infrastructure effortlessly.

What are the benefits of choosing StrongDM?

Enhanced Security: Reports show improved security postures.
Efficiency Gains: Users experience reduced time in access management.
Improved Compliance: Facilitates meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost Effectiveness: Invests in reducing potential data breaches.

In finance and healthcare industries, StrongDM is often implemented to safeguard sensitive information, ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. It provides an agile approach to access management, which is critical for sectors dealing with confidential data and strict compliance mandates.

StrongDM

Sample Customers

Cavium

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM

July 2025

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. StrongDM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.