One Identity Safeguard vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

One Identity and Sectona are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.2, while Sectona is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. One Identity holds a 3.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to Sectona’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sectona users who would recommend it.

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,728 Views
2,610 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews

439 Views
439 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

One Identity Safeguard and Sectona Privileged Access Management compete in the privileged access management category. Sectona, with its extensive features and integration capabilities, seems to have the upper hand despite One Identity's better pricing and support.

Features: One Identity Safeguard is known for its robust security measures, flexibility in customization, and strong safety features. Sectona is favored for its in-depth reporting, seamless system integration, and richer functionalities that enhance access management efficiency.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard could benefit from improved system updates, better documentation, and updates for advanced functionalities. Sectona users desire enhancements in scalability, a more intuitive experience, and improvements in scalability to meet their growing needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is easier to deploy, with users noting prompt and helpful customer service. Sectona's deployment is more complex, but its proactive customer service team provides extensive support and guidance, making it essential for users to rely on them for full product utilization.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard offers more favorable pricing, with users experiencing satisfactory ROI due to its comprehensive safety features. Sectona, despite higher initial costs, provides substantial ROI over time and is considered a worthwhile investment by those who prioritize features.

To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (7th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 3.6%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

Pankaj-Mishra

Senior IT Security Engineer at Mahindra Group

Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability

There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."

"We deployed it into our company for controlling a client's behavior in our data center. It is very useful to control their connections, such as RDP."

"The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"It provides secure and centralized access to both on-prem and cloud servers, which we did not have before. Previously, there were myriad ways to access our servers, so this centralizing feature is beneficial."

"It offers high availability and enables end users to deploy the solution with 99.999 percent uptime, which is crucial in an enterprise environment with a large number of endpoints."

"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."

"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."

"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."

Cons

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

"Support for One Identity Safeguard could be improved because sometimes the support team doesn't have an answer or solution for some bugs. A feature I found in a competitor would make One Identity Safeguard better, and that is the ability to load balance the traffic in the target."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"We have not had any issues with the core product itself, but there is an add-on called SCALUS, which is quite critical to the user experience, and that does not work. They have been having issues with that for quite a long time, like months. That is not great at all."

"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."

"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

Healthcare Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?

The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 27% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 15% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 51% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 26% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 23% of the time

More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

August 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management

July 2025

Sectona Privileged Access Management report

Download Sectona Privileged Access Management product report

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona

Sample Customers

Cavium

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

July 2025

Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.