Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

One Identity Safeguard vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

One Identity and Sectona are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.2, while Sectona is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. One Identity holds a 4.0% mindshare in PAM, compared to Sectona’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sectona users who would recommend it.
One Identity Safeguard
Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews
  • 2,831 Views
  • 1,112 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Sectona Privileged Access M...
Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews
  • 386 Views
  • 192 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

One Identity Safeguard and Sectona Privileged Access Management compete in the privileged access management category. Sectona, with its extensive features and integration capabilities, seems to have the upper hand despite One Identity's better pricing and support.

Features: One Identity Safeguard is known for its robust security measures, flexibility in customization, and strong safety features. Sectona is favored for its in-depth reporting, seamless system integration, and richer functionalities that enhance access management efficiency.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard could benefit from improved system updates, better documentation, and updates for advanced functionalities. Sectona users desire enhancements in scalability, a more intuitive experience, and improvements in scalability to meet their growing needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is easier to deploy, with users noting prompt and helpful customer service. Sectona's deployment is more complex, but its proactive customer service team provides extensive support and guidance, making it essential for users to rely on them for full product utilization.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard offers more favorable pricing, with users experiencing satisfactory ROI due to its comprehensive safety features. Sectona, despite higher initial costs, provides substantial ROI over time and is considered a worthwhile investment by those who prioritize features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (7th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)
Sectona Privileged Access M...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.0%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Tor Nordhagen - PeerSpot reviewer
Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation
We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.
Read full review
Pankaj-Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability
There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All the features are promising, but we love the reporting feature because we can get each and every report. That's a major compliance requirement. Its reporting is really amazing, and it has made life a lot easier."
"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."
"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."
"It provides secure and centralized access to both on-prem and cloud servers, which we did not have before. Previously, there were myriad ways to access our servers, so this centralizing feature is beneficial."
"One of the most important aspects is that it is very easy to use and install. It is also agentless, so all of the operations happen more smoothly than any other product."
"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."
"There is ease of implementation."
"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."
More One Identity Safeguard pros
"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."
"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."
"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."
"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."
 

Cons

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."
"We are still in the onboarding phase, and it seems very manual. Ideally, a single interface to integrate all these processes would be useful."
"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."
"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."
"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."
"It needs more marketing."
"Support for One Identity Safeguard could be improved because sometimes the support team doesn't have an answer or solution for some bugs. A feature I found in a competitor would make One Identity Safeguard better, and that is the ability to load balance the traffic in the target."
"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."
More One Identity Safeguard cons
"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."
"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."
"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."
"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."
"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."
"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."
"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."
"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."
"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."
More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice
"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."
"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Healthcare Company
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?
The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.
See all answers
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...
See all answers
What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?
The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?
Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?
Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 34% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 16% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 9% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 9% of the time
Saviynt vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
Saviynt vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 8% of the time
More One Identity Safeguard Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management
Compared 67% of the time
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management Logo
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management
Compared 33% of the time
More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
April 2025
One Identity Safeguard reportDownload One Identity Safeguard product report
Buyer's Guide
Sectona Privileged Access Management
April 2025
Sectona Privileged Access Management reportDownload Sectona Privileged Access Management product report
 

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona
 

Sample Customers

Cavium
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management
April 2025
Free Report: One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our One Identity Safeguard vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.