Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Nutanix and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Kovai.co is ranked #46. Nutanix holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Kovai.co’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Read 28 Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) reviews

4,814 Views
1,155 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

3,100 Views
837 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Turbo360 and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) compete in cloud management. Turbo360 has an advantage with affordable pricing and robust support, while NC2 leads with advanced features supporting its higher pricing.

Features: Turbo360 offers holistic monitoring capabilities, seamless integration with cloud services, and robust support. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) provides flexibility in hybrid cloud solutions, high-performance computing functionalities, and a comprehensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Turbo360 offers a user-friendly approach with responsive customer support, facilitating quick configuration and issue resolution. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) has a sophisticated deployment strategy requiring technical expertise, suited for complex environments with structured service support.

Pricing and ROI: Turbo360 presents competitive pricing structures, offering compelling ROI for businesses focused on cost-efficiency. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) involves a higher initial cost, justified by its extensive features and effective scaling potential, determining its value based on long-term assessment and budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Ranking in Cloud Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (6th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (2nd)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Cloud Management

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (66th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), Cloud Cost Management (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)	1.3%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	1.3%
Other	97.4%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Jose Ybarra

Manager, Information Technology Engineers at IBC Bank

Enables us to grow at the speed of business and be ready for whatever is coming

What I admire most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is its scalability; that option that everybody seems to eventually go to is cloud, and we're ready for that when we decide. This scalability feature has improved my company because we can grow at the speed of business, and that's very important. We're not limited by the hardware that we have. We allow ourselves room for growth, and we can literally grow from today to tomorrow to ensure that we're handling our growth. The scalability is critical for us, especially in the banking industry, where we just get bigger every year.

Read full review

reviewer1858887

Software Development Engineer In Test at Quinbay

Centralized, great for performing corrective actions and has a helpful Business Activity Monitoring module

1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and a few more Azure services. 3) It would be much better if it is a multi-cloud management/monitoring platform. 4) The consolidated error reports sent via the alerting channels can be a bit more intuitive. 5) Their customer support was good but good technical documentation or feature videos can be even more helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our previous solution was inconsistent and took a long time to recover. NC2 consistently delivers full disaster recovery in a few hours. That was a huge selling point. We need to know that our business can be up and running in hours, not days. We didn't have a real disaster recovery plan before NC2. That's a goal we've been trying to achieve, and Nutanix gives us what we need to make that a reality"

"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."

"It's easy to use, the UI is easy to configure, and it supports snapshots and backup integration."

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) a ten."

"There is ease of use. It is very important for our customers to have one centralized management console. Scalability is also very important for our customers."

"What I admire most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is its scalability; that option that everybody seems to eventually go to is cloud, and we're ready for that when we decide. This feature of scalability has improved my company because we can grow at the speed of business, and that's very important."

"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."

"The solution can scale well."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pros

"That is exactly where Serverless360 helped us by bringing in both Service Bus management and monitoring under the same hood."

"Serverless360 transformed the way our organizations manage Azure and hybrid integrations."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

Cons

"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."

"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."

"I don't have the expertise to build a hybrid cloud. We are starting to build one and haven't tried that part yet. I want to try because that is the most critical part for us. I want to see what, if anything, could be improved. The product is fantastic locally. Now, I want to try it in the cloud. My problem is not in the infrastructure; it is in the application, a different thing."

"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."

"Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) could be improved as it currently looks and feels slightly different than on-prem."

"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."

"The snapshots have room for improvement."

"It should not be so expensive. Its price is high, but at the same time, it does give the results it offers."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are positives and negatives to licensing. It all makes sense now, but it took a while. When the licenses first changed, it was a bit confusing."

"The licensing portability can be very interesting. At the moment, I am working with Nutanix Appliances with the AHV as a hypervisor. I did not have a chance to ask for portability between platforms, but it will be good if you can have portability between multiple types of platforms."

"I feel that the prices could be improved, but the truth is that I am very happy. The license price keeps increasing, but I am confident that it is much more reasonable than other brands."

"I am working on one configuration that is priced at $50,000 USD, whereas another one that I'm working on is estimated to cost $250,000 USD."

"The solution has been more costly at this point. We do not see any cost savings."

"The licensing model of Nutanix is complex."

"The price is high."

"The solution's licensing can be very pricey."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

I'm not familiar with the contracts, but I thought the process was pretty seamless. Licensing for the Nutanix part was the same as licensing something on-prem, and since it runs on bare metal EC2, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

From an improvement perspective, I cannot see anything at this point because I used those Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) at that moment, but I am currently not using it. The pricing could be lower.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

I use the workload migration feature between clouds, such as migrating from VMware to Nutanix. I use Nutanix Move to migrate workloads from Nutanix Move. However, in some cases with our failover cl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 5% of the time

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Competitors

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 7% of the time

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

April 2026

Download Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Clusters

Serverless360

Overview

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) provide scalable and cost-efficient infrastructure management across cloud and on-premises environments. With features like data portability and ease of setup, NC2 enables seamless migration without application refactoring.

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) supports businesses in managing hybrid IT environments, enhancing disaster recovery, and optimizing workloads. Users value NC2 for its unified management platform and redundancy features, facilitating cloud migration and integration with major cloud providers. Challenges include pricing and initial setup complexity, as well as feature parity between different cloud services.

What are the key features of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

Scalability: Easily scales resources to meet business demands.
Cost Management: Controls and reduces cloud-related expenses.
Data Portability: Ensures seamless migration between environments.
Unified Management: Manages both cloud and on-premises platforms from one place.
Integration: Connects efficiently with multiple cloud providers.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Redundancy: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities and operational resilience.
License Portability: Simplifies license management across different environments.
Optimized Workloads: Maintains performance and reduces unnecessary costs.
Efficient Setup: Simplifies initial adjustments, ensuring quick deployment.

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) find application in industries requiring reliable infrastructure management, like finance and healthcare, to safeguard critical systems. Organizations leverage NC2 for virtual desktops, application modernization, and smooth transition to cloud operations, improving data security and replication processes.

Nutanix

Turbo360, previously known as Serverless360, provides advanced capabilities for managing distributed systems efficiently, catering to a knowledgeable audience seeking streamlined operations and enhanced performance.

Turbo360 offers a comprehensive suite designed to support businesses in tracking and managing complex distributed applications. It equips professionals with essential tools to simplify the intricate processes of application integration and monitoring, ensuring seamless operational functionality. Targeting a tech-savvy audience, Turbo360 enhances oversight and control over application processes, optimizing resource use and fault detection.

What are the key features of Turbo360?

Integration Tracking: Monitors data flow across applications.
Error Management: Detects and resolves system issues swiftly.
Performance Monitoring: Provides insights into application efficiency.
Resource Optimization: Streamlines resource allocation for better performance.

Why choose Turbo360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with optimized resource use.
Improved Performance: Enhances application speed and reliability.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with ease.

Industries implementing Turbo360, specifically in finance and healthcare, benefit from its robust tracking and monitoring abilities, improving service delivery and resource management. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on innovation and digital transformation.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

The Home Depot, JetBlue, Hyundai, ShiftLeft

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

April 2026

Free Report: Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.