We performed a comparison between Nozomi Networks and SCADAfence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Tenable and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security."Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"The solution should include an integration library."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow."
Nozomi Networks is ranked 1st in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 3 reviews while SCADAfence is ranked 7th in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 1 review. Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4, while SCADAfence is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCADAfence writes "Easy to integrate, enhances operational efficiency, and has machine learning capabilities". Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Forescout Platform and Dragos Platform, whereas SCADAfence is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos and CyberX.
See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.
We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
