SonicWall Capture Client and Norton Small Business offer competitive security solutions for small businesses. SonicWall Capture Client is perceived as better due to its support and features, while Norton Small Business is preferred for its pricing and value.
Features: SonicWall Capture Client is praised for its comprehensive endpoint protection, malware detection, and integration with other SonicWall products. Norton Small Business is valued for its straightforward usability, multiple device coverage, and effective real-time threat protection.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client users request enhancements in reporting tools, a more intuitive configuration process, and simplification of some features. Norton Small Business users are looking for more advanced threat detection, broader customization options, and additional advanced security functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client receives high marks for its deployment flexibility and responsive customer service. Norton Small Business is appreciated for its quick installation process, though some users indicate delays in customer service.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is viewed as more expensive, but the high-quality features and support justify the cost. Norton Small Business is celebrated for its affordability and solid return on investment, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
The RAM usage is higher compared to SentinelOne, utilizing approximately 150 megabytes of memory.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Norton Small Business | 2.2% |
SonicWall Capture Client | 0.6% |
Other | 97.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 2 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.