Nolio Release Automation vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and SAS are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

3,603 Views
3,459 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SAS rPath [EOL]

Read 1 SAS rPath [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

SAS rPath [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nolio Release Automation and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nolio Release Automation

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (5th)

SAS rPath [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

it_user172788

Senior Software Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.

rBuilder Packaging and Automation I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment API, deployment options, and the documentation. 2.5 years Yes, as did not support platforms like ubuntu. No issues encountered We did not test scalability Customer Service: Customer Service…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The valuable features are: Ability to keep the map of different environments in a single tool, ability to design and manage DevOps activity from a graphical point of view, and ability to manage large installations with more than 5,000 servers due to its 100% scalable architecture."

"We have the repeatability, we have the confidence that it's doing the same thing each time the way we've set it up to do and just being able to have the expectation of knowing exactly what's going to happen in the order that our infrastructure needs it to happen."

"The frictionless end-to-end, automated deployments remove manual handovers between different parties, making it fault-tolerant without human errors, technology-agnostic, and consolidated on one tool instead of multiple solutions with manual implementations."

"It has reduced deployment times from nearly a couple of hours to around a couple of minutes, especially on production environments."

"For my organization, in particular, it’s going to improve our throughput; we're not going to have delays in testing because we had some sort of manual entry error or transposition error, and we should be able to release our software to the customer in a much more efficient fashion."

"Ability to maintain the maps of different environments in a single tool."

"The technical support is excellent."

"With CA Release Automation, the customers whom I worked with were able to increase the number of deployments, increase the deployment speed, increase the number of concurrent deployments, lower the error rate, and improve the visibility and the reliability of the deployment process."

More Nolio Release Automation pros

"I integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and set up a Continuous Deployment."

Cons

"Initial setup was extremely complex due to infrastructure challenges and the specs required to get this implemented."

"I think the biggest complaint that we've gotten from the development side is that the user interface, the experience is not as good as they'd like it to be."

"It could use better integration with development tools."

"How the product could really improve is when we were actually given the product and started to implement it, we were looking to CA to provide best-case scenarios. But because we're so unique, we had no templates to work off of."

"If I were to consider investing in a new deployment automation tool, I wouldn't switch to CA Release Automation, because of the CA strategy."

"I would suggest that, rather than just concentrating on release automation and management, this tool could provide for more automation in different areas, such as database automation (we already have this but still can be improved further)."

"Can Nolio make a coffee.........."

"When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."

More Nolio Release Automation cons

"Customer Service was poor Technical Support: Only a few people actually had in-depth knowledge"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	39

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nolio Release Automation?

I am working for an organization where they have been using Nolio Release Automation since 2016-2017. We are currently using version 6.6, and due to dependencies and lack of support from Broadcom, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nolio Release Automation?

The 6.9 version offers significant improvements over 6.6. The dashboard is very appealing, showing information about applications and offline agents. We can easily remove offline agents and upgrade...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Release Control vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 12% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 10% of the time

Chef vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 7% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

UrbanCode Deploy vs SAS rPath [EOL]

Compared 61% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SAS rPath [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More SAS rPath [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

October 2026

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2026

Download SAS rPath [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CA Release Automation

rPath

Overview

Nolio Release Automation streamlines deployment processes with a versatile GUI supporting both technical and non-technical users. The platform integrates with tools such as Jenkins and ServiceNow, enhancing release management efficiency while supporting diverse operating systems.

Nolio Release Automation provides a flexible platform for workflow creation without programming. It offers pre-built action packs and zero-code deployment design to streamline deployments, reducing release times significantly. While the integration with modern tools could improve and the documentation lacks depth, Nolio nonetheless centralizes production deployment activities and provides critical infrastructure for DevOps teams. Despite needing better scalability and process version control, organizations continue using the platform for virtual services and to navigate dependencies due to Broadcom's support limitations.

What are the key features of Nolio Release Automation?

User-friendly GUI: Facilitates use by technical and non-technical staff.
Zero-code workflows: Allows creation of workflows without programming expertise.
Pre-built action packs: Offers ready-to-use solutions for deployment tasks.
Tool integration: Compatible with Jenkins and ServiceNow through plugins.
Cross-platform support: Operates on diverse operating systems seamlessly.
Enhanced visibility: Provides clear insights into release processes.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Efficiency boost: Streamlines deployment, reducing time and costs.
Team productivity: Improves release management and operational control.
Scalability: Supports a wide range of organizational needs and environments.
Cost reduction: Decreases reliance on external vendors and costly resources.
Flexibility: Adapts to various deployment scenarios and technologies.

Nolio Release Automation is implemented across industries to manage and deploy web applications and data systems efficiently. Companies leverage its capabilities for virtual service offerings, minimizing vendor dependency and associated costs. The platform serves as a central deployment tool for production environments, with updates from version 6.6 to 6.9 managed by DevOps teams despite limitations in support and scalability.

Broadcom

rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.

SAS

Sample Customers

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.