IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Nokia Qt vs Spring MEAP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nokia Logo
43 views|25 comparisons
Spring Wireless Logo
38 views|25 comparisons
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Hi @Volodymyr Nabok, maybe you have any pointers for@Yanxia Li? Tnx. 
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
Views
43
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
Views
38
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Qt is much more than just a cross-platform SDK - it's a technology strategy that lets you quickly and cost-effectively design, develop, deploy, and maintain software while delivering a seamless user experience across all devices.

Spring’s cost-effective, easy-to-use mobile solutions and management dashboards are the choice of leading consumer goods companies around the world. Spring is the only retail execution vendor to receive high marks in every business category reviewed by Gartner and the Promotion Optimization Institute (POI).

Offer
Learn more about Nokia Qt
Learn more about Spring MEAP
Sample Customers
Intel Corporation
JDE Coffee, L'Oreal, Anheuser-Busch Inbev, Unilever

Nokia Qt is ranked 11th in Mobile App Platforms while Spring MEAP is ranked 12th in Mobile App Platforms. Nokia Qt is rated 0.0, while Spring MEAP is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Nokia Qt is most compared with , whereas Spring MEAP is most compared with .

See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.