SnapLogic and Nintex Process Platform compete in the integration and automation software category. SnapLogic has the upper hand in integrating large data volumes with low-code and AI capabilities, while Nintex takes the lead in workflow automation with strong integration with Microsoft products.
Features: SnapLogic's integration of large data volumes is simplified through its low-code development and AI-based functionalities. It also offers flexibility with multiple system connections using visual snaps. Nintex enables rapid workflow creation using a Vizio-style designer, focusing on ease of SharePoint integration and SmartObject capabilities. It provides robust process automation and strong integration with Microsoft products.
Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could improve with broader canned integrations and enhanced high-volume data processing. Users seek better API management and more transparent data flow options. Nintex users have cited issues with logging, notifications, and workflow error reporting, indicating a need for improvement. Enhanced integration features and improved cloud performance are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic offers flexible deployment with hybrid and cloud options but needs faster technical support and resolution speed. Nintex is generally deployed on-premises with some cloud support. Its technical support receives mixed reviews, but an active community and comprehensive documentation support its users.
Pricing and ROI: Nintex, though considered expensive, offers significant value and ROI with its shift to a subscription-based model and improved process automation. SnapLogic incurs a high initial cost, especially for complex integrations, but provides scalable usage with potential substantial value through large-scale integrations and low-code solutions.
SnapLogic is really helpful and processes in very little time, so it doesn't take much time compared to any legacy tool.
Some SMEs are allotted for the organization, so in case of any issue, we have their email IDs to contact them for support, including SMEs and community.
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten.
I rate the scalability of SnapLogic as eight out of ten.
But recently, in a year, I haven't found many performance issues in SnapLogic.
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
They can improve more visuals, with graphical representations, such as how many things can be added, how many users can be added or dropped, and how the back-end nodes can be graphically shown in a better way.
I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower.
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
I also like the whole child-parent pipeline feature; it allows me to break up a process into smaller pieces and then have one big pipeline that controls these smaller pipelines.
I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL.
It's moving into AI, so we can create AI agents with LLM models. We can use most of the LLM such as Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Azure AI.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Nintex Process Platform | 1.9% |
SnapLogic | 0.6% |
Other | 97.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 17 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 24 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.
Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.
What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.
The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.