MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs OpCon comparison

Salesforce and SMA Technologies are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9, while SMA Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.1. Salesforce holds a 6.3% mindshare in WA, compared to SMA Technologies’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of SMA Technologies users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 59 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

11,013 Views
1,762 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpCon

Read 59 OpCon reviews

1,883 Views
1,695 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

OpCon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

MuleSoft's Anypoint Platform and OpCon compete in the integration and automation sectors, respectively. MuleSoft holds an advantage in hybrid integration with its comprehensive API management, while OpCon excels in automation for complex scheduling and batch processes.

Features: MuleSoft offers API management and integration capabilities with cloud and on-premise support, high performance, and over 200 connectors for various applications. Rapid API development is facilitated through tools like RAML and visual interfaces. OpCon, on the other hand, provides automation suited for scheduling and batch processes, with flexible job dependencies and self-service features that simplify automation for non-technical users. OpCon's automation landscape integrates with various systems and allows users to run automation tasks with ease.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft users often seek better technical support response times, simpler setup tools, and a more accessible licensing model. Price and complexity can be obstacles for smaller companies. OpCon users desire a better user interface, a reduced learning curve, and improvements to the Solution Manager for increased satisfaction and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft provides flexible deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, suiting varied organizational needs, but reports of inconsistent technical support persist. OpCon focuses primarily on on-premise environments and is frequently lauded for its responsive support team, fostering strong client relationships through dedicated engagement.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft has a complex and high-cost pricing model, often challenging for smaller entities despite its strong ROI for larger organizations due to reduced maintenance costs. OpCon, while not the cheapest, is considered cost-effective compared to competitors, offering significant labor and operational efficiencies, making it appealing for smaller organizations seeking value in automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Workload Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

OpCon

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 6.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpCon is 1.7%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	6.3%
OpCon	1.7%
Other	92.0%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Mohan BS

Senior Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A useful tool to integrate applications and for data transformations that need to improve in the area of price and support

The main area where improvements are required in the product revolves around budgeting. The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle. Mule Anypoint Platform is made available with many components, and whether users use them or not depends on their choices. For example, though there is a tool called Anypoint MQ, our organization prefers to pay and use Kafka, as we don't want to use MuleSoft Anypoint MQ. In Mule Anypoint Platform, there needs to be proper segregation to help users identify what they need and don't need, making it an area where users need to be careful when opting for MuleSoft. Mule Anypoint Platform is an integration tool and not an ETL solution. When a user has to deal with a huge number of data, then Mule Anypoint Platform should not be a preferred choice since it can only be used for lightweight purposes revolving around APIs. There is a need to have a clear architectural decision made before opting for Mule Anypoint Platform. When there is a requirement for heavy data transformation, then users need to decide whether to go with Mule Anypoint Platform or any other platform available in the market. Though the tool comes with many useful components, it depends on whether the user plans to use all of its features. Recently, the product has come up with a new feature that is similar to an API catalog. MuleSoft had come up with the UAPIM feature almost eight months to a year ago, which had some concerns in the area of budgeting. Whether you build APIs using Javacore or any other tools, they can be cataloged using MuleSoft's UAPIM feature, for which users need to pay an extra amount, making it an area of concern for users. It would be great if MuleSoft's support team could provide help with the area of Kubernetes.

Read full review

Jose Rivera Hernandez

Senior VP of Technology at Triangle Credit Union

Helps automate all kinds of jobs and it's worth the price because it saves a lot of time and money

One problem that I had with them when we got SMA Technologies is that sometimes the jobs fail, but they automatically restart. SMA Technologies automatically gets a notification that the job has failed, and they restart it on their end, so now, we have the job restarting twice. There were times when we came into the office in the morning, and we had two files because the job ran twice. I do not know if the system can prevent a job from running the second time. If a job has run successfully, or it is running, it should not run again.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"MuleSoft's integration with Salesforce products makes it a preferred choice for those setups."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"It is so simplistic that it gives us peace of mind. Before, we had all these processes that were run manually, such as different file transfers and jobs running for our core at certain times. Now, all that stuff is done automatically."

"It allows batch work to run as smoothly and efficiently as possible."

"File Watcher can run jobs when files are made available in a folder."

"It has streamlined operations, specifically with the timing of our processes. We don't have to worry about if things are going to run at a certain time. The automation allows us to say, "Okay, we want this to run at this time, and this to not run until that is done." So, it has really streamlined the accuracy and timeline of when jobs run throughout the day."

"It allows us to organize everything into a process flow throughout the day for our different tasks that we have to run. So, it keeps everything organized. It is easy to monitor and adjust, if we need to."

"Thus far we have only had a few minor problems, all of which the vendor addressed quickly. We have not encountered any major problems. The product is very stable and reliable."

"It can run scripted tasks automatically over and over without intervention. That is what it does and the part that I really like because repetitive tasks need to be done over and over, day after day, no matter what day of the week it is. It is difficult to have staff do these manually and consistently, especially over weekends or through the night. Instead, you can have OpCon do them."

"For us, the most valuable feature of the solution is the file transfer piece and being able to automate the moving of files around between our various vendors. It reduces the time involved versus somebody having to individually move the files around."

More OpCon pros

Cons

"From a monitoring point of view, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve on tracking transactions."

"The price could be improved."

"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."

"One area for improvement is the Community Hub or developer portal, which should be part of the base offering."

"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"We would like a display of the created date, created by, and last modified date, as well as modified by."

"I would like to see them improve the Solution Manager for the web application. It's the future for us. Our customers need a lot of functionality, but there isn't that functionality within Solution Manager. So they have to develop and improve it."

"The calendar interface and the frequency interface is a very powerful, yet complex, section of OpCon in which all our staff have made mistakes. They have implemented what they believed was logically correct and then afterward discovered that their logic was flawed because OpCon did it a different way. That part, which is incredibly useful, is also incredibly dangerous. The interface or the ability to directly do more functions within the frequency definitely has room for expansion. As good as it is, it can be a lot better."

"Usage is a little complex. It's not like you can bring somebody in and they can just use it. They have to be trained... As far as complexity goes, it's right up there."

"There is a learning curve. We had to go to class, learn, and take their training classes, then come back. We got assistance from OpCon as well to convert our processes on the Unisys machine over to the IBM. Now, when we add new products, it's pretty straightforward to write a new process and schedule it, then run it at a set time of day."

"Licensing would be the first part I would overhaul. Each time a new licensing paradigm comes out, more features are removed and costs are added. They "add" features that are rarely used and increase charges for the number of jobs run. I'm sure someone in finance got a raise for their brilliance but the end-users won't thank them one bit. Expect price hikes and threats when you hold them to account at every opportunity."

"The FICS integration is a little bit clunky. We've had some tickets with their support team, and sometimes they couldn't figure it out, but that probably has more to do with FICS than with OpCon."

"The biggest area where there is room for improvement would be integration with their code. They've got a function for embedded scripts and it would be nice if that worked with a code or versioning management system, like GitLab."

More OpCon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"The product is still very expensive."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The total cost of ownership is about the same to our previous product. The costs are relatively similar."

"The pricing is over $100,000 for our credit union and I believe it's $89,000 for our clients, in total, annually."

"Yearly, it's around $30,000."

"Compared to AutoSys and ISE, OpCon was a lot cheaper to put in. AutoSys is hundreds of thousands of dollars to just install it because they don't have an interface into our system. You have to teach them what your system does."

"While the base pricing is reasonable, the à la carte options are making the overall cost more complicated and potentially problematic."

"The cost is just shy of $20,000. That's for two licenses annually, production, and failover. It is a pricey solution. Comparatively speaking, you can certainly find schedulers which are cheaper. In some cases, you can find ones that are free or use free solutions. However, OpCon is by far the superior quality product, and you pay for that. This also has a cost savings associated with an FTE, so you can more than outweigh the cost of the solution if you were to reduce the staff that you have onsite. Plus, this means that you don't need to have someone during irregular hours."

"The pricing is very reasonable."

"Annually, we pay $29,000. This is for a blanket policy that covers everything, like licensing and support."

More OpCon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

46%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Non Profit

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	29
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpCon?

My favorite feature is the dashboard feature, which shows jobs that are running, and completed, any failures, and provides dashboard reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpCon?

I am the one who signs the contract. In the beginning, when I started working here, it seemed very expensive, but after I learned everything that it does, I found it worth the price. I would recomm...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpCon?

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 8% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Control-M vs OpCon

Compared 29% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs OpCon

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs OpCon

Compared 12% of the time

VisualCron vs OpCon

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Platform vs OpCon

Compared 8% of the time

More OpCon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

OpCon

September 2025

Download OpCon product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

No data available

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

API Management: Comprehensive tools for managing APIs effectively.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates diverse integration patterns.
Connectors: Extensive library for connecting various systems.
Observability: Enhances monitoring and performance tracking.
Batch Processing: Manages large volumes of data efficiently.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing data demands across platforms.
Performance: Simplifies complex deployments and improves processing.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments, from cloud to on-premises.
User-Friendly: Streamlines integration processes with robust tools.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.

Salesforce

OpCon enhances automation with features like auto-scheduling and Corelation KeyStone integration, empowering users with self-service capabilities. Its intuitive interface and flexibility boost productivity, providing reliable automation and efficient file transfers.

OpCon is a powerful automation platform known for streamlining operations through features like auto-scheduling and robust integration capabilities. It facilitates seamless automation, allowing users to execute tasks without direct environment access and simplifies job dependencies. Users benefit from self-service capabilities, which enable easy task execution by non-IT staff, reducing errors and human intervention. With its modern interface, OpCon supports efficient file transfers and integrates effectively with multiple systems, enhancing productivity. While offering significant scalability, OpCon users suggest improvements in web functionality, script-writing, and graphical displays, along with enhancements in user authorization and notification systems. There is also a need for better template management, clearer logging, improved mobile accessibility, and expanded training resources.

What are OpCon's Key Features?

Auto-scheduling: Efficiently automates task scheduling.
Corelation KeyStone Integration: Allows for automation without direct environment access.
Self-service Capabilities: Enables non-IT users to execute tasks with ease.
Modern Interface: Simplifies job dependencies and task management.
File Transfers: Supports secure and efficient file management.
Flexibility: Integrates with diverse systems to boost productivity.

What ROI Can Users Expect?

Increased Productivity: Automation reduces manual task dependency.
Error Reduction: Streamlined processes minimize human intervention.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs effectively.
Time Savings: Frees up resources for strategic initiatives.

OpCon is widely used in industries like financial services, where automation and scheduling tasks are critical. Financial institutions rely on OpCon for core processing tasks, including reporting, automated workflows, and vendor file exchanges. The platform handles high volumes of jobs across platforms, ensuring efficient operations and reducing reliance on manual processes.

SMA Technologies

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

LOHR, Carnival Cruise Lines, Herbalife, Digital Federal Credit Union, Synergent, Frandsen Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon

September 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. OpCon report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.