Mule ESB vs Workday Business Process Framework comparison

Salesforce and Workday are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8, while Workday is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Salesforce holds a 20.4% mindshare in E, compared to Workday’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Workday users who would recommend it.

Mule ESB

Read 49 Mule ESB reviews

3,924 Views
3,297 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Workday Business Process Fr...

Read 3 Workday Business Process Framework reviews

100 Views
56 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

Workday Business Process Fr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Workday Business Process Framework and Mule ESB are key players in the enterprise technology space. Each has its strengths, with Workday leading in HR and financial management and Mule ESB excelling in system integration.

Features: Workday offers flexible process automation, approval workflows, and audit controls within HR and financial systems. Mule ESB is noted for seamless API integrations, data transformation capabilities, and its ability to connect diverse applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workday's cloud-centric design supports a streamlined deployment experience in HR and financial contexts. Mule ESB's integration-driven focus can result in more complex deployment processes given its connectivity features. Workday provides customer support tailored to business processes, while Mule ESB focuses on supporting integration challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Workday often incurs higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, leading to significant ROI in HR and financial efficiencies. Mule ESB's competitive cost model benefits businesses seeking flexible integration solutions, with ROI from improved system connectivity. Workday may initially be more costly but offers substantial ROI in its target functions, whereas Mule ESB adds value with its easy integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workday Business Process Fr...

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Mule ESB is 20.4%, down from 22.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workday Business Process Framework is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha

Technology Consultant at Ernst & Young

Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs

There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.

Read full review

FelixGonzalez

Senior Workday Integration Developer at Success Academy Charter Schools

Helps to do multiple things like assigning tasks, approvals, report creation, and communications

I use the solution for integrations. Workday Business Process Framework helps in automation. The tool helps to do multiple things like assigning tasks, approvals, report creation, and communications. We encountered delays with the tool. I have been working with the product for ten years.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."

"The API management capabilities are exemplary. You can apply security policies to most applications, monitor logs, and get analytical data on request reception, response generation time, associated APIs, endpoints, and inbound and outbound messages."

"The most beneficial features of Mule ESB are the control plane and runtime plane."

"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."

"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."

"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."

"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."

"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."

More Mule ESB pros

"It is efficient to fine-tune some of our organizational processes and policies."

"The tool helps to do multiple things like assigning tasks, approvals, report creation, and communications."

"I find it easy to navigate, especially when it comes to tasks like extending offer letters. Everything is configured into a single template, eliminating the need to create multiple offer letters for different positions. The effectiveness, user-friendliness, and adaptability to new features are key strengths of Workday. It's also convenient for sourcing, allowing us to revisit candidates who performed well but didn't pass the interview. Workday's harmonized platform brings everything together in one place, making it efficient and streamlined."

Cons

"There are some features on the commercial version of the solution that would be great if they were on the community version. Additionally, if they added more authorization features it would be helpful."

"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."

"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."

"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."

"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."

"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."

"The current version will not be supported for much longer."

"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."

More Mule ESB cons

"We encountered delays with the tool."

"There could be more automation included."

"At times, I've heard from our technical team that configuring or implementing certain requests from senior leadership can be challenging. There seem to be constraints in fulfilling specific requirements. Unfortunately, I don't have detailed information as it's what I've gathered from discussions with the technical team. There might be limitations in what can be achieved, but I can't provide specific examples without more context. Certainly, there's room for enhancement, especially in terms of regular upgrades. I've noticed that there aren't many updates, and it would be beneficial to have improvements. Regular upgrades and the introduction of new, innovative solutions could make our work more efficient and easier to manage."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."

"This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing must be improved."

"Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other factors. Large customers benefit from more flexibility in implementation and renewal compared to smaller ones."

"Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."

"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."

"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

"I find it reasonably priced, even for startups. The cost is minimal and depends on what features you want to add. Workday allows customization and personalization, and it operates like a cloud solution, making it affordable as long as you know what you need."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

What do you like most about Workday Business Process Framework?

I find it easy to navigate, especially when it comes to tasks like extending offer letters. Everything is configured into a single template, eliminating the need to create multiple offer letters f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workday Business Process Framework?

At times, I've heard from our technical team that configuring or implementing certain requests from senior leadership can be challenging. There seem to be constraints in fulfilling specific require...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workday Business Process Framework?

We utilize it for payroll purposes, including the calculation of compensations for union workers. Additionally, we use it to draft offer letters. This is within my role in the HR department, specif...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 12% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Mule ESB

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

April 2025

Download Mule ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

April 2025

Workday Business Process Framework report

Download Workday Business Process Framework product report

Also Known As

No data available

Business Process Framework

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Salesforce

The Workday Business Process Framework consists of a powerful set of tools that enable you to automate business processes and deliver the right information to the right people at the right time.

Workday

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

Allied Global, HP, CareFusion, Tripadvisor

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework

April 2025

Free Report: Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework

Find out what your peers are saying about Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mule ESB vs. Workday Business Process Framework report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.