"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"API management."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The interface is really user-friendly."
"The solution offers very good end-to-end capabilities."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"They do not have a data center in Europe, and we have lots of personally identifiable information in our dataset that needs to be hosted by a third-party data center like Amazon or Microsoft Azure."
"The workflow could be improved."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 12 reviews while Palantir Foundry is ranked 6th in Cloud Data Integration with 2 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 7.8, while Palantir Foundry is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Constantly improving to help connect applications, data, and devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palantir Foundry writes "User-friendly, good automation, and allows you to do a better job of data governance". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with TIBCO BusinessWorks, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Mule ESB and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Palantir Foundry is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Palantir Gotham, Alteryx Designer, SAP Data Services and Informatica Data Integration Hub. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Palantir Foundry report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
