We performed a comparison between Moodle and SAP SuccessFactors based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Moodle offers flexibility, customization options, course backups, and integration with Zoom and Teams. SAP Litmos has been praised for its user-friendly interface, customizable dashboard, robust course library, and powerful scheduling system. Users say that Moodle could enhance its interface, mobile app, reporting, and social media integration. SAP Litmos needs more flexibility to create custom rules and improvements to its dashboards and reporting.
Service and Support: Some users found Moodle support helpful, while others believe there is room for improvement. SAP Litmos likewise received mixed feedback regarding its support.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Moodle can be complex and may require technical skills and knowledge of databases and PHP. SAP Litmos has a user-friendly and straightforward setup that is suitable for mid-sized organizations. Although customization may require technical knowledge, the platform is generally easy to navigate and does not require much maintenance.
Pricing: Moodle's cost may vary depending on the partner and certification status. It's an open-source product without any recurring fees, but customers may need to spend additional money on customization and integration. SAP Litmos offers various pricing plans with additional charges for specific features.
ROI: Moodle saves time and money by reducing the need for multiple individuals in tests and quizzes. SAP Litmos improves onboarding speed through self-registration and completion of induction beforehand, but SAP Litmos users found it difficult to quantify an ROI.
Comparison Results: Our users generally prefer Moodle over SAP Litmos. It offers greater flexibility and customization options, allowing users to create various activities and materials. Moodle has a wide range of features, including course backups and integration with other tools like Zoom and Teams. Users find Moodle to be user-friendly and accessible. Its modular design makes it easy to expand with plugins. While SAP Litmos is also praised for its ease of use, Moodle's extensive features and adaptability make it the preferred choice.
"Its pricing is good, and its performance is good when it works."
"There is a couple of good features available, you can customize the dashboard, CSA, and home page. You can customize the solution to your business standards. SAP Litmos offers a library of 2,500 plus courses to premium members. They have a good library of pre-built courses. It's a variety of soft skill courses including management, and marketing. You can offer these courses to your students, which is excellent."
"The plug-and-play format can be deployed immediately which is unlike its competitors that take three to four months."
"This is a very scalable solution. We had over 10,000 students in our instance and their billing model makes scaling affordable to do."
"From a learning management system admin perspective, it has a user-friendly interface, but the functionality is deep. So, you can automate people in and out of courses. It lowers the general admin of an LMS admin so that I can focus more on value-adding things for the organization I'm working with."
"Its user interface is quite good. The platform is quite user-friendly. The UI/UX of the platform is very advanced, which helps in getting the users interested in the training."
"It's very easy to design content and create training models within the app, so you don't always have to use a third-party tool to develop your e-learning."
"Content Author removes the need for a third-party solution for content creation."
"The most valuable feature is the community. Moodle is a completely open source application and provides a lot of development knowledge. The other features we find valuable are the LTI tools, integrations and BigBlueButton."
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to input data into the model."
"Moodle integrates with many third party plugins, which has enabled us to make use of the latest technology. During the Covid 19 period, we used a plugin called BigBlueButton to facilitate online learning which was quick and easy to do."
"The ability to insert a variety of tools, create and organize course content, and share large volumes of materials, written, audio, or visual, is very valuable."
"Moodle has a vast array of features which are really useful for the work our company does. Moodle hosts the courses through online systems and also offers quizzes and badges which our customers frequently use."
"The solution is stable."
"Cost-effective and intuitive."
"This is a scalable solution. We have had 30,000 students using the solution. During COVID, we were able to accommodate a 500% increase in traffic."
"The solution lags in defined security parameters with only three predefined roles available."
"Lacks a variety of language options."
"The rules are not very flexible in terms of administration. They have a predefined system with three standard rules that cannot be customized, modified, added, or removed."
"They can really improve in the reporting area. While doing sessions, there are various types of reports, such as the attendance report or assessment report. We can export the Excel dump of the report, but it is not that neat and clean. You have to change it a lot. You can customize the Excel dump as per your requirement, but it is not that user-friendly in terms of the admin part. They can do much better. They have room for improvement in the reporting area."
"One feature that a few of my clients have been requesting is CPD. We should be able to capture CPD points for users within the system to be able to report on those."
"The reporting could be improved. When we first subscribed to Litmos, it had a great reporting engine, but SAP altered it. Some of the changes have reduced the ability to extract reports from it. It's excellent for live data, but it can be tricky when I want to get a report."
"The reporting in Litmos could be improved. It is difficult to pull accurate reporting based on how the solution is set up and parameters are selected."
"The auto-assign feature that auto assigns courses to learners and puts them into a different learning path has had a bug for the last year and a half. My team has spent numerous hours trying to troubleshoot and fix that, but it's still broken. Until they fix that, it's going to be a higher admin burden for people to manage."
"The ability to input modified, individual, independent grades in a grade center component is not just hard. It almost always requires you to get tech involved. When you're dealing with a learning system where you have people in an open enrollment with all different levels of learning modes or methodologies, and as well as a worldwide student body, you end up with situations where you have to absolutely exempt somebody from a grade or an assignment and enter a new, different kind of assignment because of their skillset or lack thereof. You can't do that in Moodle. It is virtually impossible to do that in Moodle without having a tech do it for you, and when you have to have that level of tech support, it becomes problematic. They need to fix the grade book center. It is the part where you do evaluations. They need to fix it so that the individual professors can make changes directly without having to get a hold of tech support to do it for them."
"Moodle is missing a subscription-based system where learners can subscribe to available courses and make the payment for those courses."
"Sometimes, the gradebook can get broken if an incorrect formula is entered during creation."
"The UI and interface of Moodle could be greatly improved. There has been some improvement in recent releases by Moodle but there is still a lot to be improved upon. It is challenging to get buy-in from different stakeholders when they see what it looks like."
"Its interface design could be more user-friendly."
"Moodle could improve by being more user-friendly. Sometimes it worked and other times it didn't. If you get stuck, then you don't have a point of contact. Additionally, a VPN is required to make sure the connection is secured."
"It would be a benefit if there was an easy single sign-on with social media services for Moodle. There are some plugins that I tried, but they didn't work seamlessly. it is a work in progress. Having the single sign-on with social media services would be appreciated because in my school we are using Google suite and the main reason why we use Google Classroom is that it is integrated seamlessly with the suite."
"Moodle should improve the interface. You can download plugins, such as templates, and use them in Moodle, but they're limited. The interface component in Moodle can improve for students because we always have to train every student on how to use some of each feature. The solution overall could be more user-friendly."
Litmos is ranked 6th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 11 reviews while Moodle is ranked 2nd in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 26 reviews. Litmos is rated 7.8, while Moodle is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Litmos writes "Comes with many advanced functionalities, and makes the users interested in the training with its amazing UI/UX". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Moodle writes "Inexpensive and pretty easy to use, but not easily adaptable for an individual". Litmos is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors Learning, Cornerstone Learning and ConvergePoint Employee Training Software, whereas Moodle is most compared with Google Classroom, SAP SuccessFactors Learning, CYPHER Learning, Chamilo LMS and Cornerstone Learning. See our Litmos vs. Moodle report.
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.