Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Zoho Cliq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
Zoho Cliq
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 12.5%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoho Cliq is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.
Anand Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides ease of communication and is a stable solution
We use the solution for our organization's internal and commercial communications The solution's most valuable feature is the ease of communication. We can schedule meetings without any network interruptions. It works fine on lower networks as well. They should reduce data consumption and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature for video conferencing capability works efficiently for remote meetings."
"Sharing documents in real-time has been incredibly helpful."
"The conversation capabilities and document management are the solution's most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature for us was instant messaging."
"The product is more convenient than taking a plane to Australia. Going to Australia can take around two days. The tool is much quicker. The video conferencing feature has improved our productivity."
"The most valuable features are the messaging and the video calling, especially where you can add a background."
"Organizing a meeting is very simple to do."
"This is a reliable and stable solution."
"It works fine on lower networks as well."
 

Cons

"There are a lot of creative people out there who can put some more UI capabilities in Microsoft Teams."
"I would say that Microsoft Team invitations from the calendar within the solution could be improved."
"Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"We face issues related to screen-sharing and stability. It is very difficult to get Microsoft's support to troubleshoot the issues. The product also needs to update its recording features."
"The chat option in the Teams tab is not very helpful. We don't use it very often. There is also an expiration on the recordings. It would be useful to not have a time limit."
"The desktop and mobile apps are quite different."
"I think they can improve the all those segments for channel bulking. Also, some functionalities which migrated from Skype for Business to Teams, is not supported by Teams. We had used them in Skype for Business."
"It may be a little daunting to learn and is still a tool in development."
"They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have content that requires more security and you want to use it in a more secure manner, with more protection, then it will come at a higher cost."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"The solution is priced high."
"The solution is part of enterprise Microsoft 365 licensing."
"The standalone license is not cheap."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution."
"It is a bit more than moderately expensive."
"I use Teams' free version."
"It is a cost-efficient solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
36%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
GameVision, CRCC Asia, Purolite, FundsIndia, GPSS, europebet
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Slack, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: June 2025.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.