Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Zoho Cliq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
Zoho Cliq
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 12.6%, down from 17.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoho Cliq is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.
Anand Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides ease of communication and is a stable solution
We use the solution for our organization's internal and commercial communications The solution's most valuable feature is the ease of communication. We can schedule meetings without any network interruptions. It works fine on lower networks as well. They should reduce data consumption and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Managing meeting on Microsoft Teams is better than managing traditional face to face meetings."
"Everything is valuable, such as the chats, the calls, and the file sharing."
"The solution is relatively stable."
"In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team."
"File sharing is the most valuable feature."
"All the functions I needed were supported very well, making the product very effective."
"The solution helps with collaborative communication. You can use it to chat and book calls. You can even set the status as away. It also has a transcript feature integrated."
"It is a stable solution."
"It works fine on lower networks as well."
 

Cons

"There's a feature that can send a notification to Team's channel, but I think there's no way to have it escalated on something like that."
"Teams requires a stronger network for joining conversations and meetings."
"For future releases, I would like to see Microsoft Teams to make a lighter application and drop some features."
"The product should provide a to-do list feature."
"Microsoft Teams could log in faster."
"Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app."
"The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month."
"They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."
"We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
"I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party companies worldwide."
"I don't think the solution is as expensive as big Webex licenses. It doesn't usually offer one-on-one licenses, so it's hard to compare. It's more expensive than the Google equivalent, but you can't replace Microsoft Teams with Google's offering."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."
"It is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable and I would rate it an eight out of ten."
"It is a cost-efficient solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
67%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
GameVision, CRCC Asia, Purolite, FundsIndia, GPSS, europebet
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.