We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Polycom RealPresence Clariti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The transcription feature is great."
"You can ping, chat, and call someone, and at the same time, on the next tab, you can see all the documents related to what someone is referring to."
"All of the solution's features are useful since we use it for saving data, chatting, meeting, and all such purposes."
"The communication part has been excellent so far."
"The Audio Call feature is its most valuable feature."
"I use the solution for messaging and chatting."
"The feature I like most in Microsoft Teams is the ability to work on the same file with other people, for example, on Microsoft PowerPoint, or Microsoft Excel, without needing to share the file via email."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Some proprietary Polycom features include speaker tracking, acoustic fencing, noise cancellation, active noise cancellation, and noise cancellation AI."
"It does a good job of integrating with other software."
"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."
"It's on-prem, which is great."
"They should allow switching between windows in a Teams meeting."
"It may be a little daunting to learn and is still a tool in development."
"Microsoft Teams could improve the integration with Outlook because most of us are not using the last version of Outlook and it causes some issues."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
"One area that could be improved is the authentication process, especially related to Windows sign-on authentication."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it initially looked complex."
"Inability to call into meetings."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."
"Could have a wider range of use cases."
"Polycom RealPresence Clariti is very bad when moving towards the cloud."
"The customer needs this platform to be a little bit more customized."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while Polycom RealPresence Clariti is ranked 15th in Virtual Meetings with 4 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Polycom RealPresence Clariti is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polycom RealPresence Clariti writes "Increases the ability of Teams when collaboration is required". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Polycom RealPresence Clariti is most compared with Cisco TelePresence and Cisco Meeting Server. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Polycom RealPresence Clariti report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
