

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
We save a lot of time for legal by using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention when searching data for legal and HR and employee issues.
I have also seen fewer accidental data sharing incidents, improved audit readiness, and increased the efficiency of the security team without needing additional headcount.
In these days of data breaches and data leakages that result in huge regulatory fines, we have not had any data breaches that could result in such fines.
With more automation in the SOC and the implementation of the next generation SOC, the headcount required for around-the-clock monitoring of ever increasing IT assets has gone down drastically.
I have seen a return on investment, as I believe we saved time; we could save a lot of time searching for important data and critical data on our network.
Securiti reduced my manual effort by thirty to forty percent, although my goal is to achieve a hundred percent reduction.
I rate it a ten because they are very quick to respond and very quick to escalate if needed.
Once we got to the Microsoft engineers, the experience was great.
In terms of support, it's top-notch and always available to help us with any support issues we raise.
The team in Asia-Pacific has been particularly supportive and generous with partners, providing comprehensive assistance and material.
On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten.
We've got a dedicated engineer, and when we get someone, we get the answer.
The policy working and detection technology need enhancements.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales well with the growing needs of our organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales effectively.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability.
The tools allow for quick building and testing, reducing overall deployment time.
Securiti's scalability is impressive; it is capable of handling a large workload for a bank having 25,000 plus branches and a customer base of around 400 million customers.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as high.
The stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is great.
I assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as quite good because I don't think it's ever gone down, unlike other parts of Azure.
We manage the environment well, and the clients manage it, so it's not crashing.
Overall, its stability compares well to other products.
The top executive or the C-level executives want to understand the impact of implementing the various cyber security solutions in terms of the reduction, tangible reduction in the business risk.
Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic.
Implementing a degree of severity ranking is essential.
More guides, more examples, and more compliance frameworks such as NIST or even PCI compliance would be great.
It would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI.
It's hard to estimate the cost. They should help with the cost estimation.
Despite them having connectors and ongoing product improvements, there are challenges with data lineage and updating relationships modules that don't match OneTrust's capabilities.
In terms of pricing, I would say it's unlimited value because it's bundled in our A5 and E5 licensing situation.
The pricing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is generally set; E5 is required, but it comes with all other products, so I would say it is fine.
Advanced DLP and insider risk features became expensive when we scaled at the enterprise level.
Vovalage was more affordable than Securiti.
It's hard to estimate the cost.
Two years ago, it was much cheaper, but now it is more expensive.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention prevents users from sharing sensitive information outside the organization based on the configurations that we've implemented.
Microsoft Purview has helped improve our organization's ability to discover sensitive data significantly as we use eDiscovery Purview, which is incredibly helpful.
It finds social security numbers in the files when we scan for it, so that we can prevent those from leaving the company.
A specific feature I find effective is the sensitive data intelligence (SDA) module, which is very useful for automating compliance processes.
I find the zero trust network, zero trust architecture, ZTA, most valuable and unique in Securiti.
Their data discovery is a fantastic product. It is AI-enabled for automatic tagging and classifiers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | 6.1% |
| Securiti | 1.4% |
| Other | 92.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention helps businesses protect sensitive data through robust compliance automation and seamless multi-platform integration, supporting environments like Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, and macOS.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on identifying sensitive data and maintaining compliance through automation and integration with platforms such as Exchange email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. Auto-labeling, classification controls, and monitoring capabilities ensure secure data management, reducing insider threat response times by 25%. While praised for its capabilities, improvements in system integration, endpoint handling, and incident management are needed. Licensing costs and limited language support pose challenges. Usability can be enhanced through interface updates and better documentation. OCR and scalability enhancements could improve policy propagation speed. More end-user training examples would be beneficial.
What are the key features?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information due to strict compliance demands. It automates data classification and policy configurations, preventing accidental data leakage and ensuring security protocols align with regulatory standards.
Securiti provides advanced solutions for automating data privacy tasks with ease, supporting organizations in achieving compliance with global regulations while enhancing operational resilience and data protection.
Securiti enhances data privacy management through its powerful automation tools. Its drag-and-drop functionality simplifies tasks, enabling efficient personal information classification and sensitive data intelligence. With features like consent management, zero trust architecture, and data lineage visualization, Securiti supports compliance with international regulations, improving data protection and ensuring business continuity. While it needs refinement in areas like technical support and data classification accuracy, its robust AI data governance package remains a major asset for businesses.
What are Securiti's Key Features?
What Benefits Can Users Expect?
In banking, Securiti aids in customer-facing applications for data protection, integrating with systems like Salesforce to manage consent. It ensures compliance with GDPR and the Australian Privacy Act, supporting industries in maintaining privacy standards. Securiti's learning packages also enhance skills in data governance and AI, proving valuable across sectors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.