Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Securiti comparison

"The product is easy to configure."

"There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems."

"It's secure and can be integrated with an existing Forcepoint DLP setup."

"For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information."

"We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

"The product can block the uploads to cloud services."

"The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts."

"We can triage based on quick and sometimes constant alerts."

"Technical support for Securiti is good."

"The process mapping is a good tool. We have a nice view of their data."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Their data discovery is a fantastic product."

"Overall, I would rate Securiti a nine out of ten."

"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."

"The automated way of identifying and classifying personal information is very beneficial."

"I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification."

"A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

"I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more."

"The solution should provide better integration with other systems."

"All the security operations are better defined in Forcepoint, while in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, you will have to use a specific workflow and then an application to release blocked emails."

"They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing."

"There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful."

"We faced a performance issue with the tool when we didn't get alerts for file uploads."

"Fraud prevention could be improved. If a criminal accesses my system and obtains my information, they might commit fraud."

"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."

"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."

"The scalability of Securiti is not high because we have to customize the solution. It is very complicated to scale, so it needs improvement."

"One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data."

"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."

"It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer."

"With the formation and education, specifically the security education, they could update the educational video more often."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."