Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs SAP Customer Identity and Access Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and SAP Customer Identity and Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Pros →

"Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is a there is some functionality where you could go and be enabled and disable everything, you can do it with no time.""The most valuable aspect of the product is the provisioning of a lot of SAP systems. It offers automated provisioning."

More SAP Customer Identity and Access Management Pros →

Cons
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Cons →

"The automated provisioning only works well with the SAP products and there are some problems with the non-SAP products. Even if it is SAP, if it is a non-ABAP system, it is a little bit problematic.""Only component, I would think the database is inbuilt. So you could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which is which allow us to create the customer or delete the Customer. And it won't allow for any change. The data migration needs improvement."

More SAP Customer Identity and Access Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication.
Top Answer:I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights.
Top Answer:We use the product as a single sign-on for our business applications.
Top Answer: Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is a there is some functionality where you could go and be enabled and disable everything, you can do it with no time.
Top Answer:You could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which allows us to create the customer or delete the customer. And it won't allow… more »
Top Answer:The implementation is very simplified, and it's a progressive implementation. Overall I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Ranking
Views
670
Comparisons
615
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
259
Rating
6.0
Views
280
Comparisons
142
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
204
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Learn More
SAP
Video Not Available
Overview

We believe the future of global identity will not be centralized in a single company or government, but rather a trust fabric of centralized and decentralized approaches. Open standards like those found in Entra Verified ID, will be required to ensure interoperability. We will leverage Microsoft’s existing penetration into F500 and governments to bootstrap and then extend from our 500M user footprint to 9B+. By leading the way, we can become the preferred provider that builds on Microsoft Entra ID's best-in-class security and compliance to now include best-in-class verifiability and privacy.

Power relevant customer experiences based on first-party data. With SAP Customer Identity and Access Management solutions for B2C, you can build rich, centralized customer profiles and synchronize them with all your digital properties.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Healthcare Company8%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
University8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise60%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise58%
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: May 2024.
771,968 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 8th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 1 review while SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is ranked 10th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 2 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Customer Identity and Access Management writes "A set of tools that allows you to manage user access to the Fiori apps and specify what users can do and see in the apps". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Okta Customer Identity and Auth0, whereas SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is most compared with Auth0 and Salesforce Identity.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.