

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Prisma Cloud compete in the vulnerability and cloud security management sector. Prisma Cloud appears to have an edge due to its extensive capabilities across multi-cloud environments and its robust workload protection features.
Features: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing detailed threat intelligence and regular advisories. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive features across multi-cloud environments, with capabilities in workload protection, compliance, and automation. Its real-time configuration monitoring makes it a strong choice for cloud-native stacks.
Room for Improvement: Prisma Cloud could improve its automation and integration capabilities, especially with newer cloud features and third-party systems. Users also find its pricing high. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management could enhance its portal refresh rate and documentation clarity, with improved integration and richer remediation guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Cloud is robust across hybrid and multi-cloud environments but may require skilled personnel for complex setups. Its customer service is mixed, with some reports of prompt technical support and others noting delays. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management benefits from smoother deployment, especially for those integrated with Microsoft products, and offers responsive technical support for a seamless deployment experience.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is economical, particularly when bundled with Microsoft licenses, offering cost-effective solutions. Prisma Cloud, while feature-rich, is seen as expensive, especially for smaller businesses. However, it offers significant ROI through enhanced security and operational efficiency, justifying its cost for larger enterprises focused on comprehensive cloud security management.
Organizations typically do not rely solely on Microsoft products to avoid putting all eggs in one basket, which presents a challenge for maximizing ROI.
As a Microsoft partner, we receive significant discounts, making the solution affordable for us.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
Reputation and data security are the two most important things to a financial institution.
We may have prevented a security breach with remediation of the findings.
They are sometimes responsive, however, often issues cannot be reproduced on their end, making it challenging.
The support we receive from Microsoft is declining, and for example, after taking advanced support, we have not received satisfactory answers.
They are familiar with Microsoft products but are not direct Microsoft staff, which is an area needing improvement.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
I would give them 10 out of 10.
The integration is straightforward for those who understand it, though documentation needs improvement.
It is scalable; I evaluated the product and decided to use Defender on over 700 of our company servers.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We haven't had any issues scaling the solution.
There aren't any limits to Prisma Cloud's scalability.
There are compatibility issues occasionally arising with false positives when other security tools are not whitelisted in Microsoft Defender.
It is very resource-intensive, consuming a lot of memory and CPU.
If Microsoft experiences downtime, this solution goes down as it is a SaaS-based solution where we have no control.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
Most of the time, when the client requires data, it is not available.
The cloud environment is dynamic, so the tool must be dynamic.
This scoring should be for specific industries as well. If I belong to the healthcare industry using Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, it should provide me with a risk score and show how I fare against the risk score of my industry.
A vulnerability I patch within 15 minutes takes 24 additional hours for an update.
The product is not stable; it often uses excessive memory and CPU, which makes it slow.
Prisma Cloud is an excellent tool.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
The pricing is reasonable, and it's included in the whole Microsoft E5 bundle, so it's all-inclusive.
The cost was not on the higher side.
If you are using a single tool like Prisma Cloud, with a single license, you can monitor all environments, such as Google Cloud, Azure, AWS, and Oracle Cloud.
It is an expensive tool.
The main advantage of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is that it can locate and prevent most threats even when the endpoints are not connected to the corporate network, as long as the internet is available.
The feature for customizing to region-specific and domain-specific requirements in healthcare is particularly beneficial.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
It provides a single pane of glass.
If I want to check how many of my S3s have encryption, I can write a Lambda function in Prisma Cloud and get that report.
Overall, the most valuable features for us in Prisma Cloud are those that provide visibility, ensure compliance with regulations, and help us align our on-premises servers and cloud environments with mandated security standards.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | 2.2% |
| Wiz | 6.4% |
| Tenable Nessus | 4.9% |
| Other | 86.5% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 12.4% |
| Wiz | 17.4% |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 8.9% |
| Other | 61.300000000000004% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, manage patches, and fortify threat detection. It offers endpoint assessments, cloud incident management, and dynamic security through Microsoft's Security Scorecard integration.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for advanced threat detection and response. It provides robust tools for vulnerability assessment and cloud incident management, integrated with Microsoft's Security Scorecard to enhance dynamic security profiling. Key features include automatic patch deployment, security configuration management, and seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, benefiting both on-prem and cloud environments. Organizations can track vulnerabilities with severity-based reports, helping manage outdated software and minimizing threat exposure.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?In healthcare, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management helps manage compliance with health regulations, while in finance, it aids in securing sensitive data from cyber threats. Manufacturing sectors benefit from its patch management, keeping operational technology systems less vulnerable to disruptions.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.