"It has been stable, and we haven't had any issues since we started to use it."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"Scalable and stable."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."
"The stability could improve."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
More SafeNet Authentication Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 1 review while SafeNet Authentication Manager is ranked 11th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. Microsoft Authenticator is rated 9.0, while SafeNet Authentication Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Authenticator writes "Stable, easy to set up, and useful for people who travel a lot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeNet Authentication Manager writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with Duo Security, Fortinet FortiToken, RSA Authentication Manager, Symantec VIP Access Manager and OneSpan DIGIPASS, whereas SafeNet Authentication Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiToken, Yubico YubiKey, Duo Security, RSA Authentication Manager and CRYPTOCARD BlackShield.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
