"It has been stable, and we haven't had any issues since we started to use it."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 1 review while RSA SecurID Access is ranked 10th in Authentication Systems with 1 review. Microsoft Authenticator is rated 9.0, while RSA SecurID Access is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Authenticator writes "Stable, easy to set up, and useful for people who travel a lot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA SecurID Access writes "Scalable and secure, but could be more compliant-based". Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with Duo Security, Fortinet FortiToken, RSA Authentication Manager, Symantec VIP Access Manager and Yubico YubiKey, whereas RSA SecurID Access is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiToken, PingID, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
