IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Micro Focus Silk Performer vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Load Testing Tools
April 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2022.
596,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • "Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."
  • "Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions."
  • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    596,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable.
    Top Answer: 
    Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner. Pricing is really less compared to Micro Focus LoadRunner, but once this product goes under the… more »
    Top Answer: 
    There were some features that were lacking in Tricentis NeoLoad, e.g. those were more into Citrix and other complicated protocols, which were supported easily by a competitor: Micro Focus LoadRunner… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    1,107
    Comparisons
    736
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    6,027
    Comparisons
    3,651
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Silk Performer
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    Overview

    Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
    Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

    Cloud in
    Integrated scalability from the Cloud
    Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

    Retina scan
    Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
    Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

    Monitor
    A leading web support for load and stress testing
    Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

    Comprehensive mobile performance testing
    Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

    The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

    Offer
    Learn more about Micro Focus Silk Performer
    Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
    Sample Customers
    University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer16%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Healthcare Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    April 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2022.
    596,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Silk Performer is ranked 15th in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Micro Focus Silk Performer is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Micro Focus Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and IBM Rational Performance Tester.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.