Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Silk Performer is ranked 15th in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Micro Focus Silk Performer is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Micro Focus Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and IBM Rational Performance Tester.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.