We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The solution is very stable."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"The documentation is limited."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The solution should be cheaper."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
