Micro Focus Silk Central vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Silk Central and Tricentis qTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: November 2022).
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Works well for test management and is a good testing repository.
Top Answer:We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.
Top Answer:I'd like to see better integration in the platform so that there is a testing automation continuum, where customers can easily mature through qTest and Tosca functionalities.
Ranking
21st
Views
486
Comparisons
304
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
6,042
Comparisons
2,884
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
184
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
qTest
Learn More
Overview
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality. 

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
Sample Customers
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Government13%
Comms Service Provider8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Insurance Company22%
Computer Software Company22%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise74%
REVIEWERS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2022.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools while Tricentis qTest is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus Silk Central is rated 0.0, while Tricentis qTest is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis qTest writes "Great for test management and automates a lot of the testing functions". Micro Focus Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Tricentis qTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise, TestRail by Gurock and TFS.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.