Meraki Dashboard vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Zenoss is ranked #64. Cisco holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Meraki Dashboard

Read 68 Meraki Dashboard reviews

6,206 Views
4,717 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

7,402 Views
3,553 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Meraki Dashboard

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and Meraki Dashboard are competing network management products. Zenoss Cloud seems to have the upper hand with superior flexibility and customization options.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers real-time analytics, anomaly detection, and predictive machine learning, which appeal to businesses needing deep insights and customizable dashboards. Meraki Dashboard offers an intuitive design, centralized management, and efficient security management, suitable for simpler setups.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve by simplifying its initial setup process, enhancing its user interface to match Meraki's intuitive design, and reducing its upfront costs. Meraki Dashboard might benefit from expanding its customization options, offering more detailed analytics capabilities, and providing deeper third-party integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers a flexible deployment model that suits complex infrastructures, supported by comprehensive service options. Meraki Dashboard's cloud-based deployment and straightforward onboarding benefit smaller setups and provide excellent customer guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud's pricing can be higher initially due to its advanced analytics and integration options, but it offers significant ROI through operational efficiencies and enhanced system performance. Meraki Dashboard, perceived as cost-effective, offers quicker ROI by reducing the complexity of network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Meraki Dashboard

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (19th), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (51st), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Meraki Dashboard is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Meraki Dashboard	0.8%
Zenoss Cloud	0.9%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

NicolasFigaro

IT Network Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud-based management has simplified global Wi-Fi operations and improved daily troubleshooting

What I would like to improve in Meraki Dashboard is the template part, which is really helping me to manage at large scale. Integration with AI or native AI functionality would be interesting depending on the price, how far it goes, and how far it shares the information I have. For the rest, it is quite straightforward. The next tool maybe to be integrated, which I do not know if it exists today within Meraki, is IPAM management for IP address management. I do not know if it is part of the roadmap, but it is something I have to use on a dedicated platform, so integrating this would be interesting as well. Finally, I would rate Meraki Dashboard overall as a 9 out of 10. There are still some missing features, but there are also some considerations. I am familiar with the Chinese situation where there is a dedicated portal for China, so if I need to deploy access points in China, I have to connect to a dedicated portal due to the regulations in that country. However, this is not due to Cisco or company policy.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we went to Meraki Dashboard, we were so happy we were jumping up and down."

"The most valuable feature of Meraki Dashboard is we can manage our switches and access point in one place."

"I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco in my IT environment as great; it is what we use for everything."

"Meraki Dashboard centralizes control of all our equipment into one cloud-based console, so we can manage it from anywhere. We can resolve problems remotely outside of business hours because it is on the cloud. You can use the dashboard to change security settings or configure routers and switches."

"The solution scales well."

"I like that Meraki Dashboard is a user-friendly product."

"Meraki gives a very comprehensive dashboard which gives the customer a lot of flexibility in terms of understanding the exact situational position of their infrastructure and what is happening in terms of the infrastructure, or how their access points are behaving."

"The user-friendly interface facilitated a quick and efficient setup process."

More Meraki Dashboard pros

"Overall, it's a great solution, and I consider it to be one of the best."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"It is the most flexible solution of this type, but it takes time to adapt."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"It would be nicer if the dashboard was lighter."

"Some features could be added."

"I am concerned about the fact that once your licensing expires the devices stop working and become a brick."

"It would be helpful to have the ability to create a floor plan based on an existing PDF or JPEG, which is automatically converted into a usable network map."

"Third-party switches do not necessarily integrate easily with the system and this could be improved to allow for better adaptation."

"It is not appropriate for large, enterprise businesses."

"The downside to the simplicity is that you can't get as granular as you could with the Cisco APs."

"The process of setting up cost and licensing was not quick. It was pretty clunky and it was a challenge."

More Meraki Dashboard cons

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is currently the most expensive on the market."

"From a pricing perspective, they are still expensive."

"The price of Meraki Dashboard is not expensive because knowing that it is a cloud-based solution has its benefits."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Typically, the license model is for one, three, and five years. They can just be a bit more flexible around it and look into providing an option for 24 months."

"Licensing for Meraki Dashboard is paid every year, and it's on a per-device model that costs roughly $300 to $400 per device, but that comes with full support and troubleshooting, etc. Compared to similar products, Meraki Dashboard is quite high-end, but the costs you pay are all-in."

"The Meraki Dashboard has more competitive pricing."

"Licensing is around under 1000 pounds. The licensing is either one year, three years, five years or ten years and during the licensing, we can choose to renew it per year or per every three years. We've got a license for three years. It's about 160 or about 200 pounds each."

More Meraki Dashboard pricing and cost advice

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki Dashboard?

Regarding their pricing, the company I work for, Akkodis, was acquired by Adecco in 2022, so I am using the same technologies and I am somehow on the contract regarding Meraki purchase and so on. P...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Meraki Dashboard?

The main aspect I would like to see improved in Meraki Dashboard is the dependency on cloud connectivity for centralized management. If the primary Internet or ISP connection goes down, access to t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Meraki Dashboard?

We have deployed the Meraki Dashboard for centralized management and monitoring of all devices, appliances, and sensors across two shopping malls. The shopping malls are connected across different ...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 31% of the time

Nmap vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds User Device Tracker vs Meraki Dashboard

Compared 3% of the time

More Meraki Dashboard Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard

September 2026

Download Meraki Dashboard product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Meraki Dashboard offers intuitive, cloud-based network management, simplifying tasks with centralized control, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive security.

Offering ease of use and a single-pane-of-glass view, Meraki Dashboard enhances network management through centralized monitoring and configuration. Its intuitive interface allows remote device management, policy configuration, and real-time alerts. Cloud-based access provides scalability and automatic updates, while detailed analytics and security measures ensure robust control over networks. Though some users mention complexity in certain configurations and third-party integration gaps, its continuous improvement and network management efficiency accommodate extensive business requirements.

What are the Key Features of Meraki Dashboard?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface that allows easy navigation and operations.
Single-Pane-of-Glass View: Centralized management of all network components from one platform.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides up-to-date insights for proactive network management.
Cloud-Based Access: Accessible from anywhere, enabling remote management and updates.
Automatic Updates: Ensures the system is always up-to-date with the latest features and security patches.
Detailed Analytics: Offers insights into network performance and security analytics.
Comprehensive Security Measures: Features built-in security protocols and tools for enhanced protection.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Consider?

Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across multiple sites.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, supporting a wide range of devices and configurations.
Integration Capabilities: Merges easily with existing systems, though improvements are desired for third-party devices.
Improved Network Efficiency: Enhances visibility and control, reducing downtime and improving performance.
Remote Management: Facilitates convenient configuration and monitoring from any location.

Enterprises deploy Meraki Dashboard for diverse network management purposes, including monitoring, access point deployment, security configuration, and VLAN and LAN management. In education, it provides centralized Wi-Fi management and ensures secure student access. Retail businesses utilize it for seamless device integration and analytics, while healthcare facilities employ its robust security and real-time monitoring to safeguard patient data and maintain network efficiency. Its cloud-based interface enhances control and visibility across numerous sites, simplifying management and configurations.

Cisco

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Coop eG, Peet's Coffee & Tea, Priefert Manufacturing, Century Care Management, Clifton College, Zürs Ski Resort, Capital FM Arena, MAXI Autohöfe

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.