Make vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Make and VMware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Make is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while VMware is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Make holds a 0.9% mindshare in PA, compared to VMware’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

327 Views
48 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

vCenter Orchestrator

Read 50 vCenter Orchestrator reviews

151 Views
84 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Make

vCenter Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

vCenter Orchestrator and Make are competitive automation tools tailored for different environments, with vCenter Orchestrator holding the advantage in enterprise integration due to its specialization within VMware ecosystems, while Make is more versatile for flexible automation solutions.

Features: vCenter Orchestrator offers tight integration with VMware environments, comprehensive automation of IT processes, and sophisticated workflow creation tools. Make provides user-friendly workflow automation, a wide array of integrations with various applications, and simplicity in connecting apps and services. The distinction is in vCenter Orchestrator's focus on enterprise IT automation, whereas Make excels in connectivity and ease of use across diverse business tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vCenter Orchestrator integrates seamlessly with VMware systems, supported by robust customer service tailored for enterprise setups. Make's cloud-based deployment is noted for its minimal setup requirements and seamless integration capabilities, with responsive customer service, making it suitable for varied platform deployment.

Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator has a higher setup cost but provides strong ROI in VMware-centric environments due to its specialized features. Make's lower initial investment delivers significant ROI through its flexible pricing and adaptability, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses looking for cost-to-performance effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

vCenter Orchestrator

Ranking in Process Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vCenter Orchestrator is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Gerhard Gmelch

IT architect endpoint at Rohde & Schwarz

Enhance automation efficiency with cost-effective graphical workflow design

I use vCenter Orchestrator for automation purposes, specifically to run automation workbooks The most valuable features are the graphical UI for designing the workflows and the interfaces that come out of the box. Additionally, it is included in the VMware Vitalization Stack, which means there…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is complete, and you don't need any add-ons."

"The most crucial feature of vCenter is its scalability. We can use it to expand our network, so we don't have to report our client devices. The network configuration features are also helpful because we can migrate entire networks."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its good automation features."

"It has the best workflow feature."

"The backup and recovery times are very quick."

"The product's integration is good, it works well with other programs and solutions."

"Communication with technical support is very good. It has a repository of knowledge base articles which we can access which are very helpful."

More vCenter Orchestrator pros

Cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"This is an expensive solution."

"I believe a transparent view and better terms of condition between Oracle and vCenter Orchestrator would be helpful."

"The interface could be improved to bring greater user-friendliness and ease of use."

"The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"It could be integrated with third-party hypervisors."

"The custom workflows are very difficult and confusing."

"Its technical support team takes a long time to escalate the issues."

"We would like more flexibility in sizing data storage and virtual machines, as the current options aren't very adaptable."

More vCenter Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"vCenter Orchestrator could be more affordable."

"vCenter Orchestrator is an expensive solution."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."

"The concept of hyper-convergence is smart. I don't know if it can be applied with less cost to be more affordable for small or medium-sized companies. The cost is a very important factor for it. We are currently depending on SAN storage. However, the hyper-converged solutions are depending on the storage within the hosts, such as vSAN in the VMware. It is a smart solution."

"My organization didn't have to pay extra for vCenter Orchestrator. It was already included, so it's basically free. Even VMware regular support is included."

"We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"I rate the product price a seven to eight out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

More vCenter Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

I don't think there's anything else Make needs, but one improvement could be the addition of no-code steps that can be used within Make, similar to what Zapier offers with its own actions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

As an entrepreneur and a freelancer who also runs my own agency, I use Make to set up automations for my clients. Recently, the most use cases are of AI agent or AI calling agent, but when I starte...

See all answers

What do you like most about vCenter Orchestrator?

The stability of the product is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCenter Orchestrator?

We're running a low-profile budget. This is not our main focus on investment technology, so we're trying to reduce costs due to the change from perpetual to subscription licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vCenter Orchestrator?

After the change from perpetual licensing to subscriptions, the cost model changed. We are considering alternatives since we lost the perpetual aspect, and support is changing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 57% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 30% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

More Make Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 50% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

More vCenter Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

vCenter Orchestrator

May 2025

Download vCenter Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Integromat

No data available

Overview

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

VMware

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Beiersdorf Shared Services

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

June 2025

Free Report: Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.