Make vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Make Logo
209 views|131 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
312 views|259 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Make and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

More Make Pros →

"The solution is stable.""The backup and recovery times are very quick.""The solution's ability to template and easily implement are the most valuable features. It offers good replication as well.""The most valuable feature is affinity rules.""In regards to the workflows, the fact that we can actually have a full dashboard library of all the existing workflows on this is great. We can see all the workflows and what all the actions do and can work with scripts.""It is the most cost-effective method for moving data between machines.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""vCenter Orchestrator is very reliable and stable."

More vCenter Orchestrator Pros →

Cons
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

More Make Cons →

"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved.""I would like to see a greater ability to do mobile administration.""I believe a transparent view and better terms of condition between Oracle and vCenter Orchestrator would be helpful.""It could be integrated with third-party hypervisors.""This is an expensive solution.""As we work towards more stability on the solution, sometimes we'll try something and it breaks and it's easier to restart the service. That's the only drawback. We've experienced this with other applications as well.""A feature to review and setup tasks should be added.""The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More vCenter Orchestrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
  • More Make Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."
  • "This solution is expensive and the licensing is more attractive for Haveri."
  • "The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."
  • "We provide the VMware solution to our clients, for which they pay a perpetual license."
  • "The concept of hyper-convergence is smart. I don't know if it can be applied with less cost to be more affordable for small or medium-sized companies. The cost is a very important factor for it. We are currently depending on SAN storage. However, the hyper-converged solutions are depending on the storage within the hosts, such as vSAN in the VMware. It is a smart solution."
  • "We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."
  • "The licensing module is somewhat complex. Calculating the cost is complicated. Many of our clients are unclear about the billing system and the traffic metering."
  • "The licensing cost is manageable because they have different versions available, standard, essential, and advanced."
  • More vCenter Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with… more »
    Top Answer:Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should… more »
    Top Answer:The stability of the product is very good.
    Top Answer:My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product.
    Top Answer:There are some update-related issues with the product. The tool's updates are released on time, so there was continuous improvement from vCenter's end. The product also has an extended community and… more »
    Ranking
    28th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    209
    Comparisons
    131
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.0
    9th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    312
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Integromat
    Learn More
    Overview

    Visualize everything you do

    Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

    • Drag and drop to connect apps
      Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.
    • Design infinite workflows
      Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.
    • Watch data flow in real time
      Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.
    VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.
    Sample Customers
    Buan Consulting, Armadia
    Beiersdorf Shared Services
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Make is ranked 28th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 45 reviews. Make is rated 7.0, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Make writes "An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Make is most compared with Camunda, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.