Magic xpi Integration Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

The compared Magic Software and SAP solutions aren't in the same category. Magic Software is ranked #27 in PaaS , and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. SAP is ranked #2 in BBM , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution.

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Read 1 Magic xpi Integration Platform review

489 Views
88 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,393 Views
1,391 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Magic xpi Integration Platform

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Average Rating

3.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (27th)

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Magic xpi Integration Platform is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
SAP Process Orchestration, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 7.1% mindshare, down 11.5% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

it_user977634

Enterprise IT Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A low-performing integration tool

We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Read full review

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is OK."

"Overall, I would rate SAP Process Orchestration a 10 out of 10."

"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

"The solution is stable."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The performance of data processing has increased."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"It is not performing well."

"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."

"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP solutions are generally expensive. SAP Process Orchestration was integrated with SAP ECC in a package, but my customers have consistently described it as an expensive product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

The user interface of SAP Process Orchestration should be more modern to enhance its appeal. It can seem complicated and outdated to new users. Additionally, the tool relies on Java, which feels le...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 36% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 33% of the time

Rocket LegaSuite vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 31% of the time

More Magic xpi Integration Platform Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 14% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Magic xpi Integration Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

July 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

Magic xpi Integration Platform is a total solution for integrating, automating and transforming the data of your business applications. The intuitive and easy-to-use interface, including 100+ pre-built connectors, makes it ideal for all types of users, from business users and citizen integrators to IT experts. Magic’s end-to-end tailored solutions are a great fit for all types of IT infrastructures, supporting all of the on-premise, cloud and hybrid integration needs of organizations around the world.

Magic Software

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Godrej Properties

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.